Skip to main content
. 2023 May 19;9(6):e16123. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16123

Table 1.

Pooled prevalence of E. coli from water, screening methods, study year and sampling sites.

Risk factors Number of studies Pooled estimates
Measure of heterogeneity
Publication bias
Samplesize Number of isolates I2 (95%CI) Q Value I2 Q-P Begg and Mazumdar rank P-value
Overall study 17 2586 3438 71.7 (56.2–83.3) 504.160 96.826 0.007 0.217
 River 5 796 433 70.5 (28.8–93.4) 204.337 98.042 0.336 0.071
 Wastewater 4 234 168 84.5 (42.1–97.6) 46.622 93.565 0.099 0.248
 Drinking water 6 1383 647 61.9 (37.7–81.3) 195.977 97.449 0.336 0.174
 Wastewater/river 1 66 66
 Beach/canal 1 107 73
Study year
 2000–2010 1 33 21
 2010–2021 16 2553 3988 72.4 (56.4–84.2) 496.859 96.981 0.008 0.343
Diagnostic technique
 PCR 6 629 576 95.3 (84.2–98.7) 39.842 87.450 0.000 0.287
 Culture and 10 1777 656 44.3 (28.9–60.9) 251.565 96.422 0.505 0.076
Biochemical test
 Colilert-18/Quanti-Tray 1 180 165
Countries
 South Africa 7 693 934 94.0 (82.9–98.1) 56.407 89.363 0.440
 Ethopia 3 220 187 45.0 (16.5–77.3) 18.157 88.985 0.784 0.301
 Nigeria 3 528 300 59.5 (39.9–76.5) 34.516 94.206 0.341 0.301
 Tanzania 1 155 155
 Morocco 1 152 48
 Kenya 1 318 53
 Ghana 1 520 97
Antibiotic test methods
 DDA 11 1997 881 58.6 (39.5–75.4) 421.833 97.629 0.883 0.218
 MIC 5 495 483 98.6 (79.1–99.9) 36.470 89.032 0.004 0.312
 VITEK® 2 AST card 1 94 23

MIC: Minimal inhibitory concentration; DDM: Disk Diffusion Assay; PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction.