Abstract
Melasma, a chronic pigmentary skin condition mainly affecting the face, remains a challenge despite the availability of several options for treatment. Many melasma patients are not satisfied with treatment outcomes. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an anti-fibrinolytic drug has shown promising results in patients with melasma. Evidence from several clinical studies has surfaced on efficacy and tolerability of TXA in these patients. It can be used as monotherapy or adjuvant with other therapies. Currently, there is no published consensus or guideline document for its use in the treatment of melasma. TXA is available for oral use, topical use as well as an injection. In this article, a consensus of Indian experts is prepared based on the available literature and experience with use of oral TXA in melasma. This review article might help clinicians for use of oral TXA appropriately while treating melasma.
KEY WORDS: Adverse event, anti-fibrinolytic agent, evidence, treatment outcome
Introduction
Melasma, a chronic, acquired pigmentary disorder due to dysfunction in melanogenesis affecting exposed body parts, mainly the face is one of the common reasons of patients to consult dermatologists.[1] Patients may develop localized hyperpigmentation of skin. The condition is associated with significant psychological disturbance resulting in impaired quality of life.[2] Although several treatment options including hydroquninone, tretinoin and corticosteroid combinations, non-steroidal topical formulations for demelanization, chemical peels and lasers, and intense pulse light are available, they do not show promising results in many patients, making treatment unsatisfactory and challenging.[1,3,4] Treatment can be frustrating both to the physician as well as patients.[5] Therefore, clinicians still look forward to newer and better treatment options for melasma.[3]
Tranexamic acid (TXA)
TXA, an anti-fibrinolytic agent, through inhibition of plasminogen activator pathway in skin, is proposed to act by preventing melanocytes activation due to ultraviolet (UV) light, hormones, and injured keratinocyte.[6]
Vascular proliferation is considered to have an important role in the development melasma.[7] Reduction in the activity of melanocyte tyrosinase by reducing prostaglandins and decreased angiogenesis in dermal blood vessels by inhibition of vascular endothelium growth factor are other proposed mechanisms of TXA in melasma.[6]
TXA is used in different formulations for the treatment of melasma.[1,2] It acts by inhibiting plasminogen activator which convers plasminogen to plasmin.[1]
TXA is available in different formulations including tablet, injection, and topical application. TXA tablets are available for oral use in the strengths of 250 mg and 500 mg. Combination of 250 mg with proanthocyanadin is also available.
Oral formulation (tablets) of TXA is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of cyclic heavy menstrual bleeding.[8] TXA injection is approved in hemophilia for short-term to reduce or prevent bleeding and decrease the requirement for replacement therapy during and after tooth extraction.[9] Considering its mechanism, several researchers have evaluated efficacy of TXA in melasma. Oral, topical, as well intradermal formulations have been evaluated for its efficacy and safety in patients with melasma. It has been used either alone or along with other therapy such as laser.[2] However, its use in melasma is not approved by US FDA or Indian regulatory authority, Drug Controller General-India (DCGI).
Despite of several published studies, and its use off-label in clinical practice currently, there is no consensus or published guideline for use of TXA in melasma. With this background, this review and experience-based consensus of Indian experts is prepared to evaluate currently available evidence with TXA and its place in the treatment of melasma.
Materials and Methods
A draft document was prepared based on the available published evidence retrieved through PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar and Cochrane Database. Search words included “melasma” “tranexamic acid” “trial” “study” words in the title. References of relevant articles were also included for review. Clinical trials, prospective studies, retrospective analysis, review articles, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, case series, and case reports were considered for this review. Studies from India as well as other countries were included for analysis of evidence. After screening of all articles, evidence from clinical studies with oral TXA is summarized. Suggestions from the experts were incorporated and draft was circulated among experts for final approval.
Results
A total of 25 clinical studies published from 2012 to 2022 involving more than 2000 patients were retrieved. The details of these studies along with results are summarized in Table 1. We have summarized the results in two sections; prospective studies and retrospective studies based on the years of publications of these articles.
Table 1.
Evidence for oral TXA in patients with melasma
Authors | Number of patients | Study design | Treatment and evaluation | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Prospective studies | ||||
Wu, et al. 2012[10] | 74 | Prospective study | Oral TXA 250 mg BD for 6 months and follow up >6 months after treatment Evaluation: Clinical improvement in pigmentation and reduction in melasma size | Excellent: 7 (10.8%) Good: 40 (54%) Fair: 23 (31.1%) Poor: 3 (4.1%) Adverse events: Gastrointestinal discomfort (5.4%) and hypomenorrhea (8.1%) Recurrence: 7 (9.5%). |
Karn, et al. 2012[11] | 260 | Prospective, randomized trial | Group A: Routine treatment measures and oral TXA (250 mg BD for three months) Group B: Only with routine topical measures. Evaluation: MASI | Significant reduction in MASI from baseline to 8 and 12 weeks with TXA Group B: Significant reduction in MASI score at 8 weeks but not at 12 weeks. |
Na, et al. 2013[12] | 25 females | Prospective study | Oral TXA three times a day plus TXA topical application twice daily for 8 weeks Evaluation: Histology and Mexameter(®), MI score | Significant decrease in mean lesional MI scores Significant reduction of epidermal pigmentation, vessel numbers and mast cell counts. |
Cho, et al. 2013[13] | 51 | Prospective study | Oral TXA adjuvant with intense pulsed light and laser Evaluation: mMASI | Significant reduction in mMASI in both groups |
Shin, et al. 2013[14] | 48 | Prospective study | Group A: Two sessions of low-fluence 1064-nm quality-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (QSNY) laser Group B: Laser plus oral TXA for 8 weeks Evaluation: mMASI | Significant reduction in mMASI score after 4 weeks of second treatment in both groups More patients had ≥grade 3 improvement in the combination group |
Padhi and Pradhan 2015[26] | 40 | Prospective, randomized trial | Group A: Cream only Group B: Oral TXA 250 mg BD plus fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, tretinoin 0.05%, and hydroquinone 2% combination/day for 8 weeks Evaluation: MASI | Significantly faster reduction in pigmentation in combination group than control arm |
Sharma, et al. 2017[27] | 100 | Prospective study | Group A: Oral TXA 250 mg BD Group B: Intradermal microinjections of TXA 4 mg/mL every 4 weeks for 12 weeks Evaluation: MASI | Equal efficacy of both treatments Relapse at 24 weeks in two patients. |
Laievardi, et al. 2017[17] | 100 | Randomized controlled trial | Combined oral TXA 250 mg thrice daily plus HQ 4% cream nightly or HQ 4% cream only Evaluation: MASI | After 6-months significantly lower MASI score in combination group compared to control arm No difference in the relapse rate or adverse events between two groups Significantly higher treatment satisfaction in combination group than controls |
Colferai, et al. 2018[1] | 47 | Single center, randomized, double blind trial | Groups: A (oral TXA 250 mg BD) or B (oral placebo BD) Tinted sunscreen (SPF 50) in all patients for 12 weeks | Improvement: Group A 50%; Group B: 5.9% (P<0.005). |
Evaluation: Photographs, colorimetry, MELASQoL, and MASI. | No severe side effects. | |||
Rosario, et al. 2018[19] | 44 patients with moderate to severe melasma | Prospective placebo-controlled study | Oral TXA 250 mg BD for 3 months and sunscreen; then 3 months sunscreen only. Evaluation: mMASI | At 3 months: 49% reduction in mMASI score versus 18% in the control group. After 3 months of stopping therapy, 26% reduction in mMASI score in TXA arm versus 19% in placebo arm. |
Khurana, et al. 2019[28] | 64 | Prospective, randomized, open-sup study | Oral TXA (250 mg BD) and TXA microinjections (4 mg/ml) monthly; follow up for 3 months with photographs and mMASI | Improvement in MASI score Oral TXA: 57.5% Microinjections: 43.5% Recurrence at 6-month follow-up, Oral TXA: 2 (6.2%) Microinjections: 3 (9.4%) |
Zhu, et al. 2019[20] | Patients with severe melasma | Prospective, randomized multi-centric study | Oral TXA 500 mg, 750 mg, 1,000 mg, or 1,500 mg. Evaluation: MASI, MI scores | All four doses were effective without significant difference between four doses Efficacy correlated with treatment time and dosage. Adverse events: Mild stomach upset and decreased menstruation. |
Malik F, et al. 2019[21] | 100 | Prospective study | Combination of topical 3% TXA versus topical 20% azelaic acid with oral TXA | Combination of oral plus topical 3% TXA provides significantly better results than oral TXA with 20% azelaic acid. |
Sahu PJ, et al. 2020[3] | 60 | Prospective, randomized trial | Oral TXA 250 mg BD (n=20); Topical TXA (n=20); Modified Kligman’s regimen (n=20) for 8 weeks along with sunscreen MASI score evaluation | Reduction in MASI score in all groups; Modified Kligman’s regimen: 30% Oral TXA: 25%; Topical TXA: 5%. |
Minni, et al. 2020[5] | 130 | Prospective, triple-blind, randomized, placebo-control, study | Group A: Oral TXA plus topical fluocinolone-based combination cream Group B: Only topical fluocinolone-based combination cream | At 12th week, marked improvement in 65.6% patients in group A vs 27.1% in group B. Recurrence at 24 weeks: Group A: 18.03% Group B: 64.4% |
Agamia, et al. 2021[15] | 60 | Prospective study | Oral TXA versus oral TXA and Q-switched Nd: YAG laser (1064-nm wavelength) Evaluation: mMASI and dermoscopy | Combination therapy is effective and well tolerated |
Shihab, et al. 2020[18] | 50 patients with melasma | Randomized, controlled, double-blind study | Combination of oral TXA and topical hydroquinone Evaluation: mMASI, MI | More efficacy with combination of oral TXA and topical hydroquinone versus hydroquinone alone |
Pomerantz, et al. 2021[22] | Six patients with moderate to severe melasma | Prospective study | D-OCT scanning of melasma affected areas on face and not affected by it. | TXA decreased dermal blood flow in both melasma and normal skin, but more reduction in melasma affected area. |
Akl EM, et al. 2021[23] | 50 females with melasma | Prospective study | Topical liposomal azelaic acid 20% vs topical hydroquinone 4% Oral TXA 250 mg once daily in both groups | Significant improvement with liposomal azelaic acid than hydroquinone 4%. Liposomal azelaic acid 20% was more significantly tolerable than comparator. |
Elkamshoushi, et al. 2021[24] | 60 patients with mixed melasma | Prospective study | Oral TXA 250 mg twice daily for three months alone versus combination of application of hydroquinone 4% or low-fluence 1064 nm Q-switched Nd: YAG laser Monthly follow up for 9 months | Significant reduction of telangiectasia in all groups. Relatively early and better cosmetic results with combination of hydroquinone 4% and oral TXA. |
El Hadidi, et al. 2021[25] | 45 female patients | Prospective, randomized trial | Group A: Oral TXA 250 mg twice daily, Group B: Intradermal TXA 100 mg/mL Group C: Intradermal TXA 4 mg/mL every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Evaluation: mMASI, MI | Significant reduction in the mMASI and MI in all groups Significant improvement in EI in group A No significant difference in three groups for changes in mMASI, MI, and EI |
Behrangi, et al. 2022[16] | 40 patients with melasma | Prospective, randomized trial | Microinjections (4 mg/ml) of TXA and Q-switched 1064 laser/2 weeks versus oral TXA 250 mg three times/day plus same laser therapy | Significant decrease in MASI score in both groups. Satisfaction and adverse events were not significantly different between two group. |
Retrospective studies | ||||
Lee, et al. 2016[29] | 561 patients | Retrospective study | Oral TXA | Improvement: 503 [89.7%] No improvement: 56 (10.0%) Worsening: 2 (0.4%) Better response in patients without family history of melasma than those with positive family history Incidence of adverse events 40 (7.1%) DVT: 1 patient (familial protein S deficiency) |
Tan, et al. 2017[30] | Refractory melasma (n=25) with mean age 47.2 years | Retrospective study | Oral TXA 250 mg BD with pre-existing combination topical therapy. Evaluation: Physician’s global assessment and MASI scores | Significant improvement in MASI scores after treatment as compared to baseline. Mean improvement in scores 69%. |
Chiang, et al. 2021[31] | 32 vitiligo patients with melasma on face | Retrospective study | Oral TXA | Mild to good improvement: 84.38% patients Moderate to excellent improvement: 81.25% patients |
TXA: Tranexamic acid, OD: Once daily, BD: Twice daily, Mmasi: Modified melasma area severity index, MASI: Melasma area severity index, MI: Melanin index, HQ: Hydroquinone
Evidence from prospective studies
Wu, et al. (2012)[10] evaluated use of oral TXA given in the dose of 250 mg BD for 6 months and follow-up was done for more than 6 months. The investigators evaluated the response in the form of improvement in pigmentation and decrease in melasma size. Good to excellent response was observed in about 65% patients. Adverse events in the form of gastrointestinal discomfort and hypomenorrhea were reported in this study. A total of 9.5% patients developed recurrence of melasma.[10] In the same year, Karn, et al.[11] published a larger randomized trial in which patients were divided into two groups. One group was treated with routine measures along with oral TXA 250 mg given twice daily for 3 months. Whereas patients in the other group were treated only with routine topical treatments. There was significant reduction in MASI at 8 and 12 weeks with TXA while in the group of patients treated only with topical measures, there was significant improvement only at 8 weeks, but not at 12 weeks. Another study[12] evaluated effects of oral plus topical TXA for 8 weeks with histological examination. They reported significant decrease in mean lesional melanin index (MI) scores along with decrease in epidermal pigmentation, vessel numbers, and mast cell counts. Cho, et al.[13] have evaluated oral TXA along with intense pulse light and laser therapy. Adjuvant therapy significantly reduced modified melasma area severity index (mMASI) in both groups, i.e., with intense pulse light as well as laser therapy.
Shin, et al.[14] compared effects of two sessions of low-fluence 1064-nm quality-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (QSNY) laser alone versus laser plus oral TXA for 8 weeks. They reported significant reduction in mMASI score after 4 weeks of second treatment in both groups. In the combination group, more patients had grade 3 or more improvement. In another study, Agamia, et al.[15] compared efficacy of oral TXA Oral TXA versus oral TXA and Q-switched Nd: YAG laser (1064-nm wavelength). The authors concluded that addition of oral TXA may enhance efficacy and decrease side effects of laser therapy. Behrangi, et al.[16] recently reported their observations of microinjections (4 mg/ml) of TXA and Q-switched 1064 laser every 2 weeks versus oral TXA 250 mg three times a day and Q-switched 1064 laser every 2 weeks. Significant reduction in MASI score was observed in both groups. There was no significant difference in adverse events between two group. A study comparing oral TXA 250 mg thrice daily plus HQ 4% versus HQ 4% cream only showed significantly lower MASI score in combination group compared to control arm after 6 months without significant difference in the relapse rate or adverse events between two groups. Importantly, significantly higher treatment satisfaction was noted in combination group.[17] In another study, Shihab, et al.[18] reported that combination of oral TXA and topical hydroquinone is more effective than hydroquinone alone. In another small single-center placebo-controlled study, oral TXA 250 mg twice daily given for 12 weeks resulted in significant improvement (50% vs 5.9%; P < 0.005). Both groups used tinted sunscreen (SPF 50). There were no severe side effects with TXA therapy.[1]
In moderate to severe melasma, oral TXA 250 mg BD provided 49% reduction in mMASI score versus 18% in the control group at 3 months. After 3 months of stopping therapy, there was 26% reduction in mMASI score in TXA group compared to baseline versus 19% in placebo group.[19] Zhu, et al.[20] 2019 reported efficacy with all four doses (oral TXA 500 mg, 750 mg, 1,000 mg, or 1,500 mg) without significant difference. In another prospective study (n = 100), combination of oral plus topical 3% TXA provided significantly better results than oral TXA with 20% azelaic acid.[21] Minni et al. conducted evaluated efficacy or oral TXA plus topical fluocinolone-based combination cream (FbTC) versus topical FbTC alone. At 12th week, there was marked improvement in 65.6% patients in the first group as compared to 27.1% in group of patients receiving topical fluocinolone-based combination cream. Recurrence at 24 weeks in the first group was much lower as compared to comparator arm (18.03% vs 64.4%).[5]
In a recent study, oral TXA has been shown to decrease dermal blood flow in melasma and normal skin, but more reduction in the former.[22] Akl, et al. (2021)[23] studied efficacy of oral TXA 250 mg OD plus liposomal azelaic acid 20% cream or hydroquinone 4% cream. There was significant improvement with liposomal azelaic acid than hydroquinone 4%. Liposomal azelaic acid 20% was more significantly tolerable than comparator. Elkamshoushi, et al.[24] studied oral TXA 250 mg twice daily for three months alone versus combination of either topical hydroquinone 4% or low-fluence 1064 nm Q-switched Nd: YAG laser in mixed melasma. There was significant reduction of telangiectasia in all groups. However, relatively early and better cosmetic results were seen with combination of hydroquinone 4% and oral TXA. Another study compared oral TXA 250 mg twice daily, intradermal TXA 100 mg/mL and intradermal TXA 4 mg/mL given every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Significant reduction in the mMASI and MI was seen in all groups. There was no statistically significant difference in three groups for changes in mMASI, melanin index (MI), and erythema index (EI).[25]
Padhi and Pradhan[26] compared topical therapy versus oral TXA 250 mg given twice daily plus fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, tretinoin 0.05%, and hydroquinone 2% combination cream given once daily for 8 weeks. In this study, there was significantly faster reduction in pigmentation with oral TXA plus triple combination therapy. In a study involving, 100 patients Sharma, et al.,[27] reported equal efficacy with oral TXA 250 mg twice daily and intradermal microinjections of TXA 4 mg/mL every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Khurana et al.[28] reported more improvement in MASI score with oral TXA than microinjections. Recurrence at 6 months follow-up was higher in the microinjection group. Recently, Sahu, et al.[3] compared efficacy of oral TXA 250 mg twice daily versus topical TXA and modified Kligman's regimen for 8 weeks along with sunscreen. Slightly, more efficacy was observed with modified Kligman's regimen followed by oral TXA. Topical TXA had lowest efficacy.
Evidence from retrospective studies
Lee, et al.[29] reported results of retrospective analysis in 561 patients. Improvement was noted in 503 (89.7%). Patients without family history of melasma demonstrated better response. Incidence of adverse events was 7.1%. Deep vein thrombosis was reported in one patient. This patient had familial protein S deficiency. Oral TXA has also reported to provide moderate to excellent improvement in 81.25% vitiligo patients with melasma on face.[31] Tan, et al.[32] refractory melasma (n = 25) with mean age 47.2 years Oral TXA 250 mg BD with pre-existing combination topical therapy. They also reported significant improvement in MASI scores after treatment as compared to baseline. A recently published meta-analysis reported effectiveness of oral TXA with well tolerated response in patients with melasma.[32]
Discussion
Large number of clinical studies with different designs and from several countries have evaluated effects of oral TXA in melasma. Most of the studies retrieved were prospective in nature. Only three studies were retrospective in design.[29,30,31]
A study evaluating TXA doses from 500-1500 mg have showed no significant difference in efficacy.[20] Usual doses of TXA in studies range from 250 mg twice daily or thrice daily. Most commonly used dose is 250 mg twice daily. TXA has been used alone as well as adjuvant with other traditional or experimental therapies in patients with melasma. It has been shown to be effective in moderate to severe melasma.[19] Oral TXA has been studied along with sunscreen,[1] topical hydroquinone (HQ),[17,18,23] topical TXA or topical azelaic acid,[21] liposomal azelaic acid 20%[23] topical fluocinolone-based combination cream (FbTC)[5] laser[14,15,16] and intense pulse light.[13] Duration of therapy ranges from 4 weeks to about 6 months.
Clinical studies discussed in the previous section have not only showed clinical benefits, but also histological improvements in patients with melasma.[12] Reduction of dermal blood flow in melasma affected areas has also been demonstrated.[22] Evidence from Indian studies[1,26,27,28] is also promising. Exact duration of therapy is not known. Recurrence has been reported after discontinuation of therapy. Results of retrospective studies are also in accordance with those from randomized clinical trials.[29,30,31] Adverse event profile from different clinical studies does not raise serious concerns. Gastrointestinal adverse events and hypomenorrhea are seen in few patients.
Adverse events and contraindications for use of oral TXA
Gastrointestinal adverse events and hypomenorrhea are reported adverse events with TXA.[10] Oral TXA should be stopped if patients receiving develops visual or ocular symptoms or severe allergic reaction.[8] TXA should be avoided in patients with hypersensitivity reactions to it, women receiving combination hormonal contraception and those with history, risk, or active thromboembolic disease.[8]
TXA is not approved for the treatment of melasma by USFDA or Drug Controller General, India (DCGI). Clinicians should inform this to the patient and obtain informed consent before using it for melasma treatment.
Expert consensus statements for use of oral tranexamic acid for the treatment of melasma are provided in Box 1.
Box 1.
Expert consensus statements for use of oral TXA in melasma
• Melasma is a recurrent, chronic, and often refractory skin condition.[6] |
• Although there are several treatment options, because of poor results in many patients,[6] there is a need of an alternative for melasma. |
• Considering the mechanism of action, TXA has an important role in melasma treatment.[6] |
• Several investigators from different countries have documented the effectiveness of oral TXA in melasma through prospective[1,3,5,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] and retrospective studies.[29,30,31] These studies have used oral TXA in different doses. |
• TXA is not approved for the treatment of melasma. Clinicians should inform this to the patient, obtain full history to rule out complications, provide full information and document same in the case notes. |
• Overall, oral TXA 250 mg twice daily seems to be promising treatment option for melasma. |
• Oral TXA is also effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with refractory melasma.[33] |
• Minimum of three-month treatment with oral TXA is required for the results. However, optimal duration of treatment is not known. |
• Oral TX can be used as monotherapy or along with other modalities.[1,3,5,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31] |
• According to the literature and experts, tranexamic acid may be given for up to six months. |
• Patients with history hypersensitivity to TXA should not receive this treatment.[8] |
• Females on combination hormonal contraception should not be treated with oral TXA.[8] |
• Presence of active thromboembolic condition or history/risk of thrombosis or thromboembolism should be excluded before initiation of treatment with oral TXA.[8] |
• Patients should be carefully selected before using oral TXA. Clinicians should rule out contraindications for use of oral TXA, before using it.[33] |
• According to experts, in case of relapse, TXA may be repeated. However, for the duration of the gap, there is no specific recommendation. |
Conclusion
Despite availability of several treatment options, outcomes of melasma are not satisfactory in many patients. Several clinical studies show that oral TXA is effective and well tolerated when given for the treatment of melasma. In order to avoid recurrence, in addition to oral TXA, other adjuvant therapies and sun protection should be advised to patients with melasma.
Financial support and sponsorship
Akumentis Healthcare Ltd supported the writing of this manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Colferai MMT, Miquelin GM, Steiner D. Evaluation of oral tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18:1495–501. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12830. doi: 10.1111/jocd. 12830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Taraz M, Nikam S, Ehsai AH. Tranexamic acid in treatment of melasma: A comprehensive review of clinical studies. Dermatol Ther. 2017:30. doi: 10.1111/dth.12465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sahu PJ, Singh AL, Kulkarni S, Madke B, Saoji V, Jawade S. Study of oral tranexamic acid, topical tranexamic acid, and modified Kligman's regimen in treatment of melasma. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19:1456–62. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dashore S, Mishra K. Tranexamic acid in melasma: Why and how? Indian J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;3:61–3. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Minni K, Poojary S. Efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid as an adjuvant in Indian patients with melasma: A prospective, interventional, single-centre, triple-blind, randomized, placebo-control, parallel group study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:2636–44. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kaur A, Bhalla M, Sarkar R. Tranexamic acid in melasma: A review. Pigment Int. 2020;7:12–25. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nguyen J, Bala HR, Ross A, Wong CC, Paul E, Rodrigues M. Effect of oral tranexamic acid on erythema index in patients with melasma. Australas J Dermatol. 2021;62:206–9. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tranexamic acid tablets prescribing information. [accessed on 6th February 2022]. available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/022430s004lbl.pdf .
- 9.Tranexamic acid in sodium chloride injection for intravenous use. [accessed on 6th February 2022]. available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/212020lbl.pdf .
- 10.Wu S, Shi H, Wu H, Yan S, Guo J, Sun Y, et al. Treatment of melasma with oral administration of tranexamic acid. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:964–70. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-9899-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Karn D, Kc S, Amatva A, Razouria EA, Timalsina M. Oral tranexamic acid for the treatment of melasma. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2012;10:40–3. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v10i4.10993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Na JI, Choi SY, Yang SH, Choi HR, Kang HY, Park KC. Effect of tranexamic acid on melasma: A clinical trial with histological evaluation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:1035–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cho HH, Choi M, Cho S, Lee JH. Role of oral tranexamic acid in melasma patients treated with IPL and low fluence QS Nd: YAG laser. J Dermatolg Treat. 2013;24:292–6. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2011.643220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shin JU, Park J, Oh SH, Lee JH. Oral tranexamic acid enhances the efficacy of low-fluence 1064-nm quality-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser treatment for melasma in Koreans: A randomized, prospective trial. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:435–42. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Agamia N, Apalla Z, Salem W, Abdallah W. A comparative study between oral tranexamic acid versus oral tranexamic acid and Q-switched Nd-YAG laser in melasma treatment: A clinical and dermoscopic evaluation. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021;32:819–26. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1708847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Behrangi E, Shemshadi M, Ghassemi M, Goodarzi A, Dilmaghani S. Comparison of efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid mesotherapy versus oral tranexamic acid in patients with melasma undergoing Q-switched fractional 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser: A blinded RCT and follow-up. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21:279–89. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Laievardi V, Ghavoumi A, Abedini R, Hosseini H, Goodarzi A, Akbari Z, et al. Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and safety of combined oral tranexamic acid and topical hydroquinone 4% treatment vs. topical hydroquinone 4% alone in melasma: A parallel-group, assessor- and analyst-blinded, randomized controlled trial with a short-term follow-up. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16:235–42. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shihab N, Prihartono J, Tovar-Garza A, Agustin T, Legiawati L, Pandya AG. Randomised, controlled, double-blind study of combination therapy of oral tranexamic acid and topical hydroquinone in the treatment of melasma. Australas J Dermatol. 2020;61:237–42. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Del Rosario E, Florez-Pollack S, Zapata L, Jr, Hernandez K, Tovar-Garza A, Rodrigues M, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of oral tranexamic acid in the treatment of moderate-to-severe melasma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:363–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhu CY, Li Y, Sun QN, Takada A, Kawada A. Analysis of the effect of different doses of oral tranexamic acid on melasma: A multicentre prospective study. Eur J Dermatol. 2019;29:55–8. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2018.3494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Malik F, Hanif MM, Mustafa G. Combination of oral tranexamic acid with topical 3% tranexamic acid versus oral tranexamic acid with topical 20% azelaic acid in the treatment of melasma. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019;29:502–4. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.06.502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pomerantz H, Christman MP, Bloom BS, Lederhandler M, Feng H, Holmes J, et al. Dynamic optical coherence tomography of cutaneous blood vessels in melasma and vessel response to oral tranexamic acid. Lasers Surg Med. 2021;53:861–4. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Akl EM. Liposomal azelaic acid 20% cream vs hydroquinone 4% cream as adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid in melasma: A comparative study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33:2008–13. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1905765. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1905765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Elkamshoushi AM, Romisy D, Omar SS. Oral tranexamic acid, hydroquinone 4% and low-fluence 1064 nm Q-switched Nd: YAG laser for mixed melasma: Clinical and dermoscopic evaluation. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21:657–68. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14140. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.El Hadidi H, Mossad R, Ragab N. The efficacy of oral vs different dilutions of intradermal tranexamic acid microinjections in melasma-A randomized clinical trial. Dermarol Ther. 2021;34:e14924. doi: 10.1111/dth.14924. doi: 10.1111/dth.14924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Padhi T, Pradhan S. Oral tranexamic acid with fluocinolone-based triple combination cream versus fluocinolone-based triple combination cream alone in melasma: An open labeled randomized comparative trial. Indian J Dermatol. 2015;60:520. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.164416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sharma R, Mahajan VK, Mehta KS, Chauhan PS, Rawat R, Shiny TN. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid and that of tranexamic acid local infiltration with microinjections in patients with melasma: A comparative study. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2017;42:728–34. doi: 10.1111/ced.13164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Khurana VK, Misri RR, Agarwal S, Thole AV, Kumar S, Anand T. A randomized, open-label, comparative study of oral tranexamic acid and tranexamic acid microinjections in patients with melasma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2019;85:39–43. doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_801_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lee HC, Thng TGS, Goh CL. Oral tranexamic acid (TA) in the treatment of melasma: A retrospective analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:385–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tan AWM, Sen P, Chua SH, Goh BK. Oral tranexamic acid lightens refractory melasma. Australas J Dermatol. 2017;58:e105–8. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chiang PH, Lin YJ, Chiu YC, Chung WH, Ku CL, Ng CY. Feasibility of oral tranexamic acid for vitiligo patients with melasma. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34:e15047. doi: 10.1111/dth.15047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Feng X, Su H, Xie J. Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in the treatment of adult melasma: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021;46:1263–73. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bala HR, Lee S, Wong C, Pandya AG, Rodrigues M. Oral tranexamic acid for the treatment of melasma: A review. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44:814–25. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]