Table 2.
Diagnostic performance of the framework and individual dentists for impacted teeth
Var | Spe | Sen | Youden’s index | AUC (SE; 95% CI) | P | Z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Framework | 0.996 | 0.964 | 0.960 | 0.980 (0.00480; 0.976–0.983) | ref | ref |
H1 | 0.997 | 0.987 | 0.984 | 0.992 (0.00291; 0.990–0.994) | 0.009* | 2.629 |
H2 | 0.998 | 0.966 | 0.964 | 0.982 (0.00463; 0.979–0.985) | 0.607 | 0.514 |
H3 | 0.997 | 0.956 | 0.953 | 0.976 (0.00527; 0.973–0.980) | 0.501 | 0.673 |
M1 | 0.998 | 0.924 | 0.922 | 0.961 (0.00676; 0.957–0.966) | 0.013* | 2.487 |
M2 | 0.999 | 0.932 | 0.931 | 0.966 (0.00642; 0.962–0.970) | 0.049* | 1.972 |
M3 | 0.997 | 0.964 | 0.961 | 0.980 (0.00480; 0.977–0.983) | 0.906 | 0.118 |
L1 | 0.999 | 0.878 | 0.877 | 0.938 (0.00837; 0.933–0.944) | < 0.0001* | 5.009 |
L2 | 0.999 | 0.901 | 0.900 | 0.950 (0.00763; 0.945–0.955) | 0.000* | 3.876 |
L3 | 1.000 | 0.883 | 0.883 | 0.941 (0.00822; 0.936–0.947) | < 0.0001* | 4.531 |
Delong test was conducted for statistically analysis of the difference of AUC between the framework and the dentists. * represents significant difference (p < 0.05)