Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 3;23:358. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03027-6

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of the framework and individual dentists for impacted teeth

Var Spe Sen Youden’s index AUC (SE; 95% CI) P Z
Framework 0.996 0.964 0.960 0.980 (0.00480; 0.976–0.983) ref ref
H1 0.997 0.987 0.984 0.992 (0.00291; 0.990–0.994) 0.009* 2.629
H2 0.998 0.966 0.964 0.982 (0.00463; 0.979–0.985) 0.607 0.514
H3 0.997 0.956 0.953 0.976 (0.00527; 0.973–0.980) 0.501 0.673
M1 0.998 0.924 0.922 0.961 (0.00676; 0.957–0.966) 0.013* 2.487
M2 0.999 0.932 0.931 0.966 (0.00642; 0.962–0.970) 0.049* 1.972
M3 0.997 0.964 0.961 0.980 (0.00480; 0.977–0.983) 0.906 0.118
L1 0.999 0.878 0.877 0.938 (0.00837; 0.933–0.944) < 0.0001* 5.009
L2 0.999 0.901 0.900 0.950 (0.00763; 0.945–0.955) 0.000* 3.876
L3 1.000 0.883 0.883 0.941 (0.00822; 0.936–0.947) < 0.0001* 4.531

Delong test was conducted for statistically analysis of the difference of AUC between the framework and the dentists. * represents significant difference (p < 0.05)