Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 3;23:358. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03027-6

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of the framework and individual dentists for full crowns

Var Spe Sen Youden’s index AUC (SE; 95% CI) P Z
Framework 0.998 0.953 0.951 0.975 (0.00641; 0.972–0.978) ref ref
H1 0.999 0.971 0.970 0.985 (0.00508; 0.982–0.988) 0.241 1.173
H2 0.999 0.960 0.959 0.980 (0.00592; 0.976–0.982) 0.642 0.465
H3 1.000 0.964 0.964 0.982 (0.00566; 0.979–0.984) 0.458 0.743
M1 0.999 0.953 0.952 0.976 (0.00641; 0.973–0.979) 0.944 0.070
M2 1.000 0.938 0.938 0.969 (0.00728; 0.965–0.972) 0.464 0.732
M3 1.000 0.953 0.953 0.976 (0.00641; 0.973–0.979) 0.922 0.098
L1 0.999 0.920 0.919 0.960 (0.00820; 0.955–0.964) 0.130 1.516
L2 0.999 0.909 0.908 0.954 (0.00869; 0.950–0.958) 0.037* 2.090
L3 0.999 0.956 0.955 0.978 (0.00617; 0.974–0.981) 0.775 0.286

Delong test was conducted for statistically analysis of the difference of AUC between the framework and the dentists. * represents significant difference (p < 0.05)