Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 3;23:358. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03027-6

Table 5.

Diagnostic performance of the framework and individual dentists for residual roots

Var Spe Sen Youden’s index AUC (SE; 95% CI) P Z
Framework 0.999 0.871 0.870 0.935 (0.02150; 0.929–0.940) ref ref
H1 1.000 0.919 0.919 0.960 (0.01740; 0.955–0.964) 0.310 1.016
H2 0.999 0.919 0.918 0.959 (0.01740; 0.955–0.963) 0.316 1.003
H3 1.000 0.887 0.887 0.943 (0.02030; 0.938–0.948) 0.731 0.344
M1 0.999 0.823 0.822 0.911 (0.02450; 0.905–0.917) 0.412 0.821
M2 0.999 0.839 0.838 0.919 (0.02350; 0.913–0.925) 0.567 0.572
M3 0.999 0.855 0.854 0.927 (0.02260; 0.921–0.932) 0.761 0.304
L1 0.999 0.839 0.838 0.919 (0.02350; 0.912–0.925) 0.592 0.536
L2 1.000 0.871 0.871 0.935 (0.02150; 0.930–0.941) 0.987 0.017
L3 0.999 0.839 0.838 0.919 (0.02350; 0.913–0.925) 0.569 0.570

Delong test was conducted for statistically analysis of the difference of AUC between the framework and the dentists. * represents significant difference (p < 0.05)