Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 3;23:358. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03027-6

Table 6.

Diagnostic performance of the framework and individual dentists for caries

Var Spe Sen Youden’s index AUC (SE; 95% CI) P Z
Framework 0.990 0.554 0.544 0.772 (0.00949; 0.764–0.781) ref ref
H1 0.980 0.621 0.601 0.800 (0.00928; 0.792–0.809) 0.007* 2.721
H2 0.944 0.755 0.699 0.849 (0.00830; 0.842–0.857) < 0.0001* 7.099
H3 0.975 0.669 0.644 0.822 (0.00901;0.814–0.830) < 0.0001* 4.799
M1 0.978 0.569 0.547 0.773 (0.00947; 0.765–0.782) 0.917 0.104
M2 0.976 0.586 0.562 0.781 (0.00943;0.772–0.789) 0.424 0.800
M3 0.988 0.546 0.534 0.767 (0.00951; 0.758–0.775) 0.623 0.492
L1 0.988 0.417 0.405 0.702 (0.00942; 0.693–0.712) < 0.0001* 6.847
L2 0.995 0.509 0.504 0.752 (0.00954; 0.743–0.761) 0.060 1.884
L3 0.990 0.402 0.392 0.696 (0.00936; 0.687–0.706) < 0.0001* 6.859

Delong test was conducted for statistically analysis of the difference of AUC between the framework and the dentists. * represents significant difference (p < 0.05)