Table 2.
Overview of results
| Benefits | Risks |
|---|---|
| increased service user autonomy | infeasibility of SBDs |
| improvement of the therapeutic relationship | difficulty in decision-making about SBD activation |
| possibility of timely intervention and prevention of harm | limited accessibility of SBDs in mental health crises |
| prevention of compulsory care | disappointment of service users due to professionals’ non-compliance with SBDs |
| reduction of the duration of compulsory care and recovery | limited evaluation and updates of SBD content |
| mitigation of negative experiences around compulsory care | |
| guidance for professionals in providing compulsory care | |
| Facilitators | Barriers |
| support for SBD completion | lack of knowledge of SBDs among professionals |
| involvement of relatives and peer experts | lack of motivation or insight among service users |
| specification of SBD content | lack of professional support for SBD completion |
| evaluation of compulsory care and SBD content | |
| Positive effects of the new law | Negative effects of the new law |
| stronger emphasis on service user autonomy | no clear added value of SBDs compared to other instruments for documenting service users’ preferences |
| legal provisions for several instruments that provide a starting point for SBD completion | lengthy and complex legal procedures for SBD activation |