Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 5:1–8. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06650-4

Table 2.

Conditions that might have contributed to placental insufficiency

FGR + SBP (n = 12) FGR–SBP (n = 26) P value
Inflammatory conditions
Extreme fear 7 (58%) 15 (58%) NS
Recent or current infection* 8 (67%) 15 (58%) NS
    Giardiasis, manifesting as lactose intolerance 6 (50%) 10 (38%) NS
    Chronic vaginal candidiasis 2 (17%) 1 (4%) NS
    Chronic sinusitis 0 2 (8%) NS
    Covid-19 infection 1 (8%) 2 (8%) NS
  Reactivated toxoplasmosis in the setting of long-term anxiety and insomnia, no signs of congenital toxoplasmosis 0 1 (4%) NS
Recent filling and botulinum toxin with C-reactive protein levels of 10.5 mg/L 1 (8%) 0 NS
Autoantibodies 6 (50%) 10 (38%) NS
    Antinuclear antibodies 6 (50%) 7 (26%) NS
    High-titer antibodies 4 (33%) 8 (31%) NS
    Anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies 0 2 (8%) NS
    Lupus anticoagulant (primary antiphospholipid syndrome) 0 1 (4%) NS
Non-inflammatory conditions
Sedentary status (< 40 min per day with physical activity) 11 (92%) 22 (85%) NS

Excessive weight gain (e.g. > 1.5 kg/4 weeks during the first

half of pregnancy), a surrogate of a high-carbohydrate diet

11 (92%) 7 (27%)  < 0.01
Inherited or acquired thrombophilia 3 (25%) 2 (8%) NS

FGR+SBI, fetal growth restriction, mothers with silicone breast implants; FGR–SBI, fetal growth restriction, mothers without silicone breast implants; NS, non-significant; *Some women had more than one infection