Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;14:1197023. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1197023

Table 2.

The kinetic parameters of the examined cleavage reactions.

Substrate Enzyme [E]T (nM) kobs (s−1) kobs/[E]T (M−1 s−1) Approx. relative efficiency
C3bB None (background) (1.0 ± 0.1) × 10−6a
FD 0.25 (1.6 ± 0.1) × 10−3 (6.5 ± 0.5) × 106 1
pro-FD-R/Q 100 (7.8 ± 0.2) × 10−4 (7.8 ± 0.2) × 103 1/800
MASP-1cf 1,000 (2.3 ± 0.6) × 10−4 (2.3 ± 0.6) × 102 1/30 000
MASP-3cf 2,000b (2.6 ± 1.0) × 10−6 ∼0.9c negligible
FB None (background) ND
FD 2,000 (6.4 ± 1.4) × 10−7 0.3 ± 0.07 1/20,000,000
pro-FD-R/Q 2,000 (2.3 ± 0.7) × 10−7d ∼0.1c negligible
MASP-1cf 2,600 (6.4 ± 2.3) × 10−6 2.5 ± 0.9 1/3,000,000
MASP-3cf 10,000b ND

The kobs/[E]T value can be considered as an estimate for the catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM). The average ± SD values were determined from three parallels, except when stated otherwise.

ND, no detectable cleavage.

a

The low-level background cleavage was probably due to a trace contaminant in C3b.

b

Approximately 90% active and 10% zymogen.

c

Close to the detection limit defined by the background. Only an approximate kobs/[E]T could be determined.

d

Average ± SD from two parallels.