TABLE 2.

Performance compared with 7 baseline methods.

Methods	AURP	AUC	F1	Acc	Rec	Spe	Pre
BNNR	0.5166 ± 0.008	0.8561 ± 0.002	0.5108 ± 0.001	0.8761 ± 0.036	0.5649 ± 0.002	0.9164 ± 0.000	0.4664 ± 0.001
DDA-SKF	0.2521 ± 0.001	0.7006 ± 0.000	0.3281 ± 0.002	0.7900 ± 0.007	0.4478 ± 0.005	0.8342 ± 0.004	0.2591 ± 0.001
DRHGCN	0.5063 ± 0.002	0.8529 ± 0.004	0.5013 ± 0.000	0.8746 ± 0.001	0.5503 ± 0.022	0.9166 ± 0.006	0.4604 ± 0.002
LAGCN	0.5135 ± 0.000	0.8045 ± 0.002	0.4699 ± 0.005	0.7966 ± 0.000	0.6005 ± 0.008	0.8220 ± 0.052	0.4198 ± 0.002
NIMCGCN	0.2316 ± 0.004	0.6684 ± 0.000	0.2889 ± 0.007	0.7611 ± 0.026	0.4227 ± 0.001	0.8049 ± 0.003	0.2199 ± 0.006
DRWBNCF	0.4552 ± 0.035	0.8375 ± 0.020	0.4739 ± 0.001	0.8646 ± 0.001	0.5321 ± 0.000	0.9076 ± 0.002	0.4280 ± 0.000
REDDA	0.4903 ± 0.000	0.8466 ± 0.016	0.4936 ± 0.045	0.8693 ± 0.004	0.5562 ± 0.003	0.9098 ± 0.000	0.4440 ± 0.002
LBMFF	0.5961 ± 0.001	0.8818 ± 0.003	0.5655 ± 0.001	0.8885 ± 0.001	0.6287 ± 0.005	0.9224 ± 0.000	0.5154 ± 0.031

The best results are in bold faces and the second-best results are underlined.