Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;14:1184292. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1184292

TABLE 4.

Subgroup analysis of pooled estimates of infarct size.

Subgroup No. of studies SMD 95% CI P value between subgroups heterogeneity within subgroups
I2(%) P value
Species 0.81
SD rats 13 -5.34 -6.60, -4.08 72 < 0.01
Wistar rats 3 -6.98 -11.96, -1.99 81 < 0.01
C57BL/6 mice 6 -5.73 -9.14, -2.32 96 < 0.01
Model 0.08
I/R 15 -5.48 -6.77, -4.19 74 < 0.01
MI 5 -4.90 -8.46, -1.33 96 < 0.01
ISO 2 -9.48 -12.83; -6.13 0 0.50
Dose <0.01
Perfused 6 -6.50 -7.86, -5.14 26 0.24
≤50mg/kg 6 -5.32 -7.49, -3.14 77 <0.01
50-100mg/kg 8 -5.94 -8.84, -3.04 95 <0.01
>100mg/kg 2 -3.13 -4.50, -1.75 90 <0.01
Drug Delivery 0.26
Perfused 6 -6.50 -7.86, -5.14 26 0.24
Intraperitoneal 4 -5.30 -9.33, -1.28 93 < 0.01
Oral 11 -5.46 -7.51, -3.42 90 < 0.01
Intravenous 1 -4.29 -6.00, -2.57 / /
Duration 0.37
<1day 11 -5.96 -7.40, -4.52 74 < 0.01
1day-1week 3 -4.02 -6.35, -1.69 68 0.05
>1week 8 -5.84 -8.73, -2.95 94 < 0.01

Note: SMD, standardized mean difference; SD rats, Sprague-Dawley rats; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; MI, myocardial infarction; ISO, isoproterenol.