Table 3. Comparison of SD value of background tissue between reconstructed images and real images using 17%PET images as input.
| Group | Liver | Lung | Aorta | Lumbar spine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D Unet-30s | 0.19 (0.15, 0.24)* | 0.06 (0.05, 0.09) | 0.12 (0.10, 0.14)* | 0.26 (0.20, 0.43) |
| P2P-30s | 0.28 (0.25, 0.33)* | 0.10 (0.07, 0.13)* | 0.16 (0.13, 0.20) | 0.29 (0.22, 0.37) |
| 17%PET | 0.45 (0.38, 0.67) | 0.12 (0.11, 0.16) | 0.35 (0.25, 0.42) | 0.66 (0.45, 0.90) |
| s-PET | 0.25 (0.19, 0.29) | 0.08 (0.06, 0.09) | 0.19 (0.16, 0.20) | 0.27 (0.23, 0.41) |
| H | 29.46 | 25.18 | 32.96 | 19.93 |
| P | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
The italic font represents a statistical difference between this value and that of the 17%PET group. And * indicates that the value is statistically significant compared with the s-PET group. SD, standard deviation; PET, positron emission tomography; s-PET, standard positron emission tomography (per bed time: 90 s); 3D Unet, a deep network model based on CNN; P2P, Pixel2Pixel deep network model based on GAN; H, H value for the Kruskal-Wallis method; CNN, convolutional neural network; GAN, generative adversarial network.