Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;15:1130833. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1130833

Table 2.

Baseline associations between renal and cognitive indicators in patients with de novo PD.

Cognitive indicators Scr UA BUN UA/Scr eGFR
β p-value β p-value β p-value β p-value β p-value
CSF Aβ42 −0.0033 0.0094 −0.0017 0.7243 0.0407 0.5959 0.1275 0.1050 0.0034 0.0156
CSF T-tau (n = 499) −0.0002 0.0626 0.0001 0.7072 −0.0020 0.6723 0.0091 0.0693 0.0015 0.1680
CSF P-tau (n = 474) −0.0004 0.1990 0.0005 0.6470 0.0130 0.4030 0.0218 0.1810 0.0004 0.1410
CSF α-syn (n = 415) −0.0036 0.0096 0.0004 0.9428 0.1047 0.1842 0.1613 0.0519 0.0036 0.0151
Serum NfL (n = 444) 0.0022 0.0696 −0.0037 0.4029 0.0815 0.2297 −0.1561 0.0282 −0.0029 0.0215
MoCA 0.0002 0.0938 −0.0001 0.7881 −0.0115 0.1674 −0.0151 0.0730 −4986.0 0.2505
HVLT total recall −0.0003 0.4320 0.0001 0.9584 −0.0279 0.1697 0.0070 0.7360 0.0302 0.3947
HVLT delayed recall −0.0002 0.5723 −0.0006 0.6570 −0.0285 0.2124 −0.0095 0.6857 0.2097 0.4377
HVLT recognition −0.0005 0.2090 −0.0020 0.1880 −0.0038 0.8759 −0.0081 0.7416 0.6959 0.6579
JoLO −0.0001 0.8936 −0.0025 0.1097 −0.0283 0.2402 −0.0313 0.2004 −0.1606 0.1410
LNS 0.0007 0.0592 0.0018 0.2240 0.0208 0.3660 −0.0054 0.8190 −0.0166 0.0698
Semantic fluency test 0.0004 0.2565 −0.0009 0.4277 −0.0016 0.9302 −0.0334 0.0775 −0.0416 0.2424
SDMT 0.0005 0.1156 0.0003 0.8101 0.0045 0.8191 −0.0336 0.0929 −0.0549 0.1004

The models were adjusted for age, sex, educational levels, APOE ε4 status, and disease duration.

Aβ, amyloid beta; APOE, Apolipoprotein E; α-syn, α-synuclein; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HVLT, Hopkins verbal learning test; JoLO, judgment of line orientation; LNS; letter number sequencing; MoCA, Montreal cognitive assessment; n, number; NfL, neurofilament light chain; PD, Parkinson’s disease; Scr, serum creatinine; SDMT, symbol digit modality test; UA, uric acid. The bold values were symbolized to statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).