Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 28;9(4):302–312. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.317

Table 2.

Primary analysis. Bivariate analyses for associations between KRAS mutation and the primary outcome of anatomic phenotyping of endometriosis

KRAS mutation
No (n = 58) Yes (n = 64) P value* RR (95% CI)
Anatomic subtype
SUP only 24 (64.9%) 13 (35.1%) 0.04 RR for DIE or OMA only and mixed versus SUP only = 1.36 (1.06, 1.74)
DIE or OMA only 8 (42.1%) 11 (57.9%)
Mixed 26 (24.2%) 40 (60.6%)
rASRM stage
I 21 (72.4%) 8 (27.6%) 0.02 RR for Stage II–IV versus Stage I = 1.40 (1.12, 1.75)
II 7 (35.0%) 13 (65.0%)
III 10 (37.0%) 17 (63.0%)
IV 18 (41.9%) 25 (58.1%)
*

Chi‐square test for 2 × 3 table (anatomic subtype) and 2 × 4 table (stage).

RR for KRAS mutation as the ‘exposure’.

Stage n = 119.