Skip to main content
. 2023 May 15;4(1):67–86. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0011

Table 4.

Evaluation Characteristics of Studies in the Meta-analysis (n = 14)

Study ID Evaluation design Sample size Mean SBP change (SD) Mean DBP change (SD) % hospitalizations % mortality
Bekelman et al.35 Randomized Control Trial Treatment: 187
Control: 197
Treatment: 29%
Control: 29%
Treatment: 4%
Control: 10%
Benson et al.36 Quasi-Experimental Treatment: 326
Comparison: 702
Treatment: 0.1 (1.4)
Comparison: −0.9 (1.3)
Treatment: −1.3 (0.9)
Comparison: −2.3 (0.8)
Blum and Gottlieb63 Randomized Control Trial Treatment: 93
Control: 182
Treatment: 31%
Control: 38%
Bowles et al.64 Randomized Control Trial Treatment: 101
Control: 116
Treatment: 16%
Control: 19%
Clark et al.59 Quasi-experimental Treatment: 118
Comparison: 871
Treatment: −14.1 (15.0)
Comparison: −7.3 (20.3)
Treatment: −7.9 (8.6)
Comparison: −2.4 (12.8)
   
Davis et al.37 2015 Quasi-experimental Treatment: 59
Comparison: 59
Treatment: 8%
Comparison: 17%
Idris et al.10 Randomized Control Trial Treatment: 14
Control: 14
Treatment: 7%
Control: 50%
Kao et al.11 Quasi-experimental Treatment: 230
Comparison: 230
Treatment: 25%
Comparison: 48%
Magid et al.17 Randomized Control Trial Treatment: 138
Control: 145
Treatment: −13.1 (20.4)
Control: −7.1 (16.6)
Treatment: −6.5 (11.7)
Control: −4.2 (10.4)
Margolis et al.38 Randomized Control Trial Treatment: 188
Control: 182
Treatment: −21.3 (20.3)
Control: −14.7 (20.0)
Treatment: −9.3 (16.4)
Control: −6.4 (16.5)
Ong et al.65 Randomized Control Trial Treatment: 715
Control: 722
Treatment: 23%
Control: 22%
Treatment: 3%
Control: 5%
Pekmezaris et al.40 Randomized Control Trial Treatment: 83
Control: 85
Treatment: 30%
Control: 29%
Simpson et al.53 Quasi-experimental Treatment: 27,042
Comparison: 12,322
Treatment: 6%
Comparison: 7%
Sobhani et al.52 Quasi-experimental Treatment: 55
Comparison: 87
Treatment: 9%
Comparison: 17%
Treatment: 2%
Comparison: 2%

DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation.