Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 15;34:100724. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100724

Table 2.

Primary efficacy analysesa.

Efficacy outcome LLDT-8 (1 mg) LLDT-8 (0.5 mg) Placebo
Primary endpoints
 Change in the CD4 counts at Wk 48, cells/mm3
 Mean 62 (40, 84) 50 (29, 70) 29 (13, 45)
 LSMEAN 63 (41, 84) 49 (29, 68) 32 (13, 51)
 LSMEAN Difference 14 (−14, 43)b; 30 (2, 59)c 16 (−10, 43)c
 P-value 0.338b; 0.036b 0.224c
 Proportion of patients with the CD4 count increased by ≥ 50 cells/mm3 at Wk 48
 No. (%) 23 (50.0) 23 (45.1) 18 (34.6)
 P-value 0.584b; 0.077c 0.302c
 Change in inflammatory factors (IP-10, hsCRP, IL-6) at Wk 48d
 IP-10, pg/ml
 Mean −72.1 (−99.9, −44.3) −42.5 (−64.3, −20.7) −22.8 (−48.7, 3.1)
 LSMEAN −72.1 (−97.7, −46.5) −42.5 (−66.8, −18.2) −22.8 (−47.1, 1.5)
 LSMEAN Difference −29.6 (−64.9, 5.7)b; −49.3 (−84.6, −14.0)c −19.7 (−54.0, 14.7)c
 P-value 0.100b; 0.007c 0.260c
 hsCRP, mg/L
 Mean −2.7 (−8.0, 2.5) −0.5 (−1.0, −0.1) −0.3 (−1.2, −0.6)
 LSMEAN −2.7 (−5.7, 0.2) −0.5 (−3.3, −2.3) −0.3 (−3.1, −2.5)
 LSMEAN Difference −2.2 (−6.3, 1.8)b; −2.5 (−6.5, 1.6)c −0.3 (−4.2, 3.7)c
 P-value 0.288b; 0.234c 0.895c
 IL-6, pg/ml
 Mean −2.1 (−7.2, 2.9) 0.7 (−0.6, 1.9) 2.6 (−2.4, 7.6)
 LSMEAN −2.1 (−6.3, 2.0) 0.7 (−3.3, 4.6) 2.6 (−1.3, 6.5)
 LSMEAN Difference −2.8 (−8.5, 3.0)b; −4.7 (−10.5, 1.0)c −1.9 (−7.5, 3.6)c
 P-value 0.340b; 0.106c 0.493c
Secondary endpoints
 Change in the CD4/CD8 ratio at Wk 24
 Mean 0.04 (0.01, 0.07) 0.04 (0, 0.08) −0.01 (−0.04, 0.01)
 LSMEAN 0.04 (0.01, 0.07) 0.04 (0.01, 0.07) −0.01 (−0.04, 0.02)
 LSMEAN Difference 0 (−0.04, 0.04)b; 0.05 (0.01, 0.10)c 0.05 (0.01, 0.10)c
 P-value 0.987b; 0.017c 0.015 c
 Change in the CD4/CD8 ratio at Wk 48
 Mean 0.05 (−0.01, 0.11) 0.04 (−0.01, 0.09) 0.04 (0, 0.07)
 LSMEAN 0.05 (0, 0.10) 0.04 (−0.01, 0.09) 0.04 (−0.01, 0.08)
 LSMEAN Difference 1.1 (−0.06, 0.08)b; 2.2 (−0.05, 0.08)c 0.01 (−0.06, 0.07)c
 P-value 0.809b; 0.646c 0.829c
 Proportion of patients with the CD4 count increased by ≥ 20% at Wk 24
 No. (%) 21 (45.7) 26 (51.0) 10 (19.2)
 P-value 0.833b; 0.005c <0.001c
 Proportion of patients with the CD4 count increased by ≥ 20% at Wk 48
 No. (%) 23 (50.0) 24 (47.1) 18 (34.6)
 P-value 0.874b; 0.240c 0.423c
 Proportion of patients with the CD4 count <200 cells/mm3 at baseline and increased to ≥ 200 cells/mm3at Wk 24e
 No. (%) 6 (60.0) 12 (80.0) 5 (38.5)
 P-value 0.252b; 0.657c 0.023c
 Proportion of patients with the CD4 count <200 cells/mm3 at baseline and increased to ≥ 200 cells/mm3at Wk 48e
 No. (%) 9 (90.0) 11 (73.3) 9 (69.2)
 P-value 0.769b; 0.339c 0.827c

Abbreviations: LSMEANS: least-squares means; CI: confidence interval; IP-10: Interferon gamma-induced protein 10; hsCRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL-6: interleukin 6.

a

The analyses were set for the FAS population. Mean, LSMEAN, and LSMEAN difference were represented as data and 95% CI. LSMEANs Difference and P-values were bversus the LLDT-8 (0.5 mg) group; or cversus the placebo group.

d

LLDT-8 (1 mg) group included 46 patients; LLDT-8 (0·5 mg) group included 51 patients; placebo group included 51 (1 missing baseline data) patients.

e

LLDT-8 (1 mg) group included 10 patients; LLDT-8 (0·5 mg) group included 15 patients; placebo group included 13 patients.