Table 4.
Distribution of Classifications of all Possible Combinations of 6-Cluster Subsamples for the 4 LGAsa
| Classification | Ikara (%) |
Kaduna North (%) |
Kankara (%) |
Katsina (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good (accepted at 90%) | 1 | 0 | 23 | 0 |
| Intermediate (accepted at 80% but not at 90%) | 14 | 16 | 70 | 0 |
| Poor (accepted at 60% but not at 80%) | 77 | 84 | 7 | 44 |
| Very poor (not accepted at 60%) | 8 | 0 | 0 | 56 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Abbreviation: LGAs, local government areas.
a
Percentages show the proportion of 6-cluster subsample combinations falling into each category. Percentages representing the category with the highest proportions of combinations are shown in bold. The classification of the LGA based on the 16-cluster sample is indicated with italics. For all 4 LGAs, the category representing the highest proportion of 6-cluster combinations matches the classification resulting from the 16-cluster sample.