Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jan 9;55(3):739–753. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0014)

Table 6.

Squared, standardized path estimates from longitudinal analysis of latent language at HV2 and HV3.

Home visit Contribution of A1 Contribution of A2 a2(A1+A2)
HV2 .62 [.49, .71] .62 [.49, .71]
HV3 .29 [.15, .42] .05 [.00, .22] .34 [.18, .49]
Contribution of E1 Contribution of E2 e2(E1+E2)

HV2 .38 [.29, .51] .38 [.29, .51]
HV3 .00 [.00, .04] .66 [.51, .81] .66 [.51, .82]

Note. Numbers in brackets are 95% CIs. A1 and E1 represent A and E influences, respectively, accounting for all the variance in HV2 and the covariance of HV2 with HV3; A2 and E2 represent A and E influences, respectively, accounting for the remaining variance in HV3, independent of HV2.