Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 6;41(6):394–401. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000949

Table 1.

Participants' Characteristics and Perceptions About Smart Mattress (N = 349)

Variable n (%) M ± SD (Range)
Age (y) 30.88 ± 6.19 (22–52)
Sex
Male 16 (4.6)
Female 333 (95.4)
Education
Community college graduates 11 (3.2)
Bachelor's degree 278 (79.7)
Some graduate education 60 (17.2)
Clinical experience (years) 7.64 ± 6.18 (0.17–30.17)
Nurses' perceptions about smart mattress
Perceived usefulness 23.76 ± 3.65 (0–28)
Perceived ease of use 22.72 ± 4.16 (0–28)
Intention to accept 12.47 ± 1.73 (0–14)
Perceived assistance in workload
 No extent 0 (0)
 Low extent 9 (2.6)
 Neutral 32 (9.2)
 Moderate extent 143 (41.0)
 Greater extent 165 (47.3)
 Overalla 5.54 ± 3.91
 Physicala 6.78 ± 5.15
 Mentala 3.77 ± 4.77
Perceived necessity
 Not at all 0 (0)
 Slightly 10 (2.9)
 Somewhat 33 (9.5)
 Moderately 153 (43.8)
 Very much 153 (43.8)

aAll ranged from −10 to +10; 0 means no changes, −10 means a full increase in the burden, and +10 means a full decrease in the burden (n = 346).