Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;3(1):e12127. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12127

TABLE 1.

Demographics and clinical characteristics of the participants at T1, T2, and T3

Characteristic T1 T2 T3
(n = 373) (n = 154) (n = 116)
Male sex, n (%) 258 (69.2%) 102 (66%) 92 (79.3%)
ADOS module completed, a n (%)
Module 1 315 (84.5%) 51 (33.1%) 31 (27.0%)
Module 2 58 (15.5%) 42 (27.3%) 12 (10.4%)
Module 3 61 (39.6%) 72 (62.6%)
ADOS‐2 calibrated severity score, a mean (SD) 7.5 (1.7) 7.0 (2.1) 7.6 (1.9)
Age (years) at IQ testing, mean (SD) [range] 3.0 (0.5) 5.6 (0.9) 11.5 (0.9)
[1.7–5.0] [4.3–9.4] [9.0–13.6]
IQ b
Full scale, c , d mean (SD) [range] 62.7 (20.7) 79.1 (32.3) 78.8 (32.1)
[20.5–132.5] [17.9–133.0] [24 – 170.0]
Verbal, d mean (SD) [range] 55.6 (25.0) 74.8 (33.0) 73.2 (36.0)
[14.0–128.0] [12.1–128.0] [24 – 157.0]
Nonverbal, e mean (SD) [range] 69.9 (18.7) 82.2 (31.2) 82.4 (30.4)
[25.5–137.0] [22.3–140.0] [24 – 170.0]
VABS communication, f mean (SD) 72.9 (15.7) 81.0 (19.7) 72.8 (18.3)
CBCL internalizing, g mean (SD) 62.2 (9.5) 59.4 (9.7) 60.0 (10.1)
CBCL externalizing, h mean (SD) 59.3 (10.9) 55.8 (10.3) 55.1 (9.5)

Abbreviations: ADOS‐2, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule; CBCL, Child Behavior Checklist; Second, Edition; VABS, Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales.

a

1 participant ADOS was not completed at T3.

b

All participants had IQ assessed using MSEL at T1; at T2, 28 participants were assessed using MSEL and 126 using Differential Abilities Scales‐II (DAS‐II) (DAS); at T3, all participants were assessed using DAS.

c

1 participant's IQ could not be assessed at T2.

d

1 participant's IQ could not be assessed due to aggressive behavior at T3.

e

2 participants' IQs could not be computed because nonverbal scores were out of range of the publisher's norms.

f

31 participants at T1, 21 at T2, and 6 at T3 are missing this variable.

g

49 participants at T1, 34 at T2, and 13 at T3 are missing this variable.

h

43 participants at T1, 26 at T2, and 12 at T3 are missing this variable.