Table 3.
Summary of generalization experiments to test datasets with longer planning horizons
| LSTM Train | Test Data | pred | timeCPX | timeML | timeimp | timegain | inf | optgap | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c | f | T | c | f | T | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | |||
| 3 | 1000 | 90 | 3 | 1000 | 180 | 25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 7.6 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| 50 | 0.4 | 1 | 20.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | |||||||
| 75 | 0.4 | 1 | 29.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | |||||||
| 85 | 0.4 | 1 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | |||||||
| 90 | 0.3 | 2 | 38.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | |||||||
| 95 | 0.3 | 2 | 44.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | |||||||
| 100 | 0.1 | 6 | 82.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | |||||||
| 100(UC) | 0.3 | 2 | 36.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | |||||||
| 3 | 1000 | 90 | 3 | 1000 | 360 | 25 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1 | 19.7 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| 50 | 0.7 | 2 | 41.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | |||||||
| 75 | 0.5 | 2 | 59.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | |||||||
| 85 | 0.4 | 3 | 64.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | |||||||
| 90 | 0.4 | 3 | 66.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | |||||||
| 95 | 0.3 | 3 | 71.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |||||||
| 100 | 0.1 | 12 | 91.9 | 1.3 | 0.5 | |||||||
| 100(UC) | 0.4 | 3 | 62.8 | 0.0 | 0.5 | |||||||
| 5 | 10000 | 90 | 5 | 10000 | 180 | 25 | 19.0 | 6.2 | 3 | 67.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| 50 | 2.2 | 9 | 88.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | |||||||
| 75 | 0.7 | 28 | 96.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | |||||||
| 85 | 0.4 | 46 | 97.8 | 0.3 | 0.6 | |||||||
| 90 | 0.3 | 59 | 98.3 | 0.9 | 0.7 | |||||||
| 95 | 0.2 | 78 | 98.7 | 2.8 | 0.9 | |||||||
| 100 | 0.1 | 166 | 99.4 | 27.5 | 3.5 | |||||||
| 100(UC) | 0.4 | 49 | 98.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | |||||||
| 8 | 10000 | 120 | 8 | 10000 | 480 | 25 | 42.4 | 11.6 | 4 | 72.7 | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| 50 | 4.3 | 10 | 89.9 | 0.0 | 0.9 | |||||||
| 75 | 1.7 | 25 | 96.1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | |||||||
| 85 | 0.8 | 55 | 98.2 | 0.0 | 0.9 | |||||||
| 90 | 0.5 | 86 | 98.8 | 0.1 | 1.0 | |||||||
| 95 | 0.4 | 112 | 99.1 | 0.4 | 1.0 | |||||||
| 100 | 0.1 | 364 | 99.7 | 5.2 | 2.8 | |||||||
| 100(UC) | 0.6 | 71 | 98.6 | 0.0 | 1.5 | |||||||
*Experiments include 20000 test instances