Table 1.
Sample | Taxon name | p-value | p-value (FDR) | Taxonomic relative abundance (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hyperendemic area 1 | Staphylococcus aureus | 0.0342 | 0.50815 | 50.0184 |
Brevibacterium avium | 0.01262 | 0.3396 | 23.2605 | |
Staphylococcus equorum | 0.03682 | 0.53963 | 14.7103 | |
Hyperendemic area 3 | Erwinia persicina group | 0.02578 | 0.76076 | 40.8605 |
Enterobacteriaceae | 0.03359 | 0.79616 | 18.9266 | |
Hyperendemic area 4 | Erwinia iniecta | 0.02578 | 0.58038 | 33.8485 |
Erwinia_uc | 0.02119 | 0.49879 | 15.3244 | |
Hyperendemic area 6 | Serratia ficaria | 0.03359 | 0.42652 | 68.4779 |
Gibbsiella quercinecans | 0.02578 | 0.33312 | 11.9534 | |
Hyperendemic area 7 | Staphylococcus sciuri | 0.04194 | 0.79094 | 19.5395 |
Hyperendemic area 8 | Arcobacter butzleri | 0.03074 | 0.44759 | 49.2067 |
AF166259_s | 0.01727 | 0.33253 | 16.3773 |
The Kruskal Wallis H test was used to determine species biomarkers by region (). The average microbiome profile of all samples (n = 24) was compared to the microbiome profile of each region (n = 2). Significant species biomarkers were determined in hyperendemic areas (1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8).