Skip to main content
. 2023 May 26;9(6):e16742. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16742

Table 3.

Recovery and precision data obtained for the selected pesticides employing both μSPEed and μQuEChERS-dSPE, in combination with UPLC-PDA.

# MTa Recovery ± SDb Spiking Levelsc Precisiond
Intra-day Inter-day
pQ μSPEed 87.9 ± 11.9 5 13.9 13.7
50 9.8 13.3
75 10.0 12.0
μQuEChERS
THIA μSPEed 97.3 ± 10.2 1 3.2 9.0
25 8.5 11.5
50 4.6 11.2
μQuEChERS 76.5 ± 10.5 5 6.7 6.2
25 2.6 7.8
100 4.1 5.6
ASU μSPEed 72.4 ± 9.1 1 2.2 5.7
25 5.4 10.2
50 5.7 12.0
μQuEChERS 91.2 ± 7.5 5 5.6 5.9
25 2.4 6.3
100 3.6 4.5
PIC μSPEed 91.3 ± 9.9 1 4.5 13.6
25 4.5 14.1
50 4.7 13.1
μQuEChERS
AME μSPEed 84.7 ± 9.5 1 4.6 13.3
25 4.2 13.6
50 4.8 9.9
μQuEChERS 88.0 ± 6.5 5 4.5 8.4
25 3.3 4.9
100 4.1 4.5
ATR μSPEed 85.2 ± 9.0 1 5.0 14.7
25 9.9 10.1
50 4.1 9.3
μQuEChERS 84.0 ± 7.8 5 5.8 6.4
25 12.0 6.7
100 4.1 4.6
LIN μSPEed 69.5 ± 7.8 1 3.9 14.0
25 5.2 10.5
50 4.7 14.1
μQuEChERS 73.2 ± 8.4 5 6.6 7.6
25 2.5 6.6
100 5.8 4.7
CYM μSPEed 66.1 ± 6.3 1 4.8 14.2
25 7.4 12.1
50 4.1 8.3
μQuEChERS 83.0 ± 12.6 5 6.2 7.4
25 2.4 4.4
100 5.8 3.8
a

Microextraction technique.

b

Average of the recovery values at 25 mg L−1of each compound with standard solutions, except for pQ using μSPEed, in which the concentration was 50 mg L−1.

c

Spiking levels in mg L−1.

d

Precision values in relative standard deviation (% RSD).