Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 13;128(12):2150–2162. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02221-1

Table 2.

PI3K inhibitor with publicly available clinical data arising from at least a phase II study in solid tumours are reported.

Drug Study ID Phase Indications Experimental treatment Control ORR mPFS (months) Discontinuation rate (due to AE)
Pictilisib (GDC-0941) FERG1 [23] II HR + HER2-BC (Part 1: previous aromatase inhibitor; regardless of PIK3CA mutation) Pictilisib + Fulvestrant Placebo + Fulvestrant 7.9% vs 6.3% 6.6 vs 5.1; HR 0.74 (0.51–1.06, p = 0.096) 18% vs 3%
HR + HER2− BC (Part 2: previous aromatase inhibitor; PTs with PIK3CA mutation) Pictilisib + Fulvestrant Placebo + Fulvestrant 7.3% vs 5% 5.4 vs 10; HR 1.07 (0.53–2.18, p = 0.84) 24% vs 5%
PEGGY [24] II HR + HER2− BC (chemo-naive with exception of previous Capecitabine; regardless of PIK3CA mutation) Pictilisib + Paclitaxel Placebo + Paclitaxel 22% vs 19.6% 8.2 vs 7.8; HR 0.95 (0.62–1.46, p = 0.83) 25% vs 15.2%
Pilaralisib (XL147) NCT01013324 [25] II Advanced endometrial cancer (progressing to 1/2 previous CT lines; regardless of PIK3CA mutation) Pilaralisib NA 6% NA 20.9%
Sonolisib (PX-866) NCT01204099 [26, 27] II Advanced NSCLC (progressing to 1/2 previous CT lines; regardless of PIK3CA mutation) PX-866 + Docetaxel Placebo + Docetaxel 6% vs 0% 2 vs 2.9; HR NA 0% vs 5%
Advanced HNSCC (progressing to 1/2 previous CT lines; regardless of PIK3CA mutation) PX-866 + Docetaxel Placebo + Docetaxel 14% vs 5% 3 vs 2.7; HR NA NA
Buparlisib (BKM120) BELLE-2 [29] III HR + HER2− BC (previous aromatase inhibitor) Buparlisib + Fulvestrant Placebo + Fulvestrant 11.8% vs 7.7% 6.9 vs 5.0; HR 0.78 (0.67–0.89, p < 0.001) 39% vs 5%
BELLE-3 [28] III HR + HER2− BC (previous aromatase inhibitor and mTORi) Buparlisib + Fulvestrant Placebo + Fulvestrant 8% vs 2% 3.9 vs 1.8; HR 0.67 (0.53–0.84, p < 0.001) 21% vs 5%
BELLE-4 [30] II/III HER2-BC (chemo-naive) Buparlisib + Paclitaxel Placebo + Paclitaxel 22.6% vs 27% 8.0 vs 9.2; HR 1.18 (0.81–1.68) 20.8% vs 7.2%
BERIL-1 [31] II HNSCC Buparlisib + Paclitaxel Placebo + paclitaxel 39% vs 14% 4.6 vs 3.5; HR 0.65 (0.45–0.95, p = 0.011) 10% vs 14%
Copanlisib (BAY 80-6946) NCI-MATCH [32] II Solid tumours (PIK3CA mutant and PTEN loss) Copanlisib NA 16% NA 10%
Alpelisib (NVP-BYL719) Solar-1 [6, 33] III PIK3CA mutant HR + HER2− BC (previous aromatase inhibitor, CDK4/6 inhibitor permitted) Alpelisib + Fulvestrant Placebo + Fulvestrant 26.6% vs 12.8% 11 vs 5.7; HR 0.65 (0.50–0.85, p < 0.001) 25% vs 4.2%
BYLieve [37] II PIK3CA mutant HR + HER2− BC (previous CDK4/6 inhibitors + aromatase inhibitor or previous CDK4/6 inhibitor + Fulvestrant or previous chemotherapy) Alpelisib + Fulvestrant NA 17% 7.3 20%
Eganelisib (IPI-549) Mario-275a (NCT03980041) II Urothelial cancer (immunotherapy naive, platinum refractory) Eganelisib + Nivolumab Placebo + Nivolumab 30% vs 25% NA NA
Mario-3 [43] II TNBC Eganelisib + Atezolizumab + Nab-Paclitaxel NA NA NA NA
Taselisib (GDC-0032) Sandpiper [46] III PIK3CA mutant HR + HER2− BC (previous aromatase inhibitor) Taselisib + Fulvestrant Placebo + Fulvestrant 28% vs 11.9% 7.4 vs 5.4; HR 0.7 (p = 0.0037) 17% vs 2%

ORR overall response rate, mPFS median progression-free survival, AE adverse event, BC breast cancer, HR hormone receptor, HER2 Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2, mTORi: mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, PIK3CA phosphatidylinositol-4, 5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha, NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer, CT chemotherapy, HNSCC head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, CDK cyclin-dependent kinase, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, NA not available.

aFor Mario-275 trial, the only available data arise from press releases, we chose to report them here since, if confirmed on peer reviewed sources, they might be relevant in the future.