Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2022 Dec 6;52(4):447–474. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2145566

Table 2.

Rigorous Studies Comprising the Evidence Base for Psychosocial Treatments of Disruptive Behavior among Adolescents (by Treatment Approacha)

 Target Treatment [Treatment Formatb] Study Authorsc Sample Typed [Country] Demographic Characteristicse,f Therapists [Setting] Treatment Conditionsg Types of Disruptive Behavior Measuresh Assessment Point(s) Post-Baseline (in Months) Significant Differences Favoring Target Treatmenti Supportive of Target Treatment

Animal Assisted Therapy

 Teacher’s Pet (TP): Dogs and Kids Learning Together [Youth Group] (Seivert et al., 2018) JJ Youth in detention facilities [United States] Age 13–18 yrs (M = 15.7)
Male = 70%
Ethnicity: 46% W, 44% AA, 4% H, 3% Mixed, 3% Other
Certified dog trainers [Detention facility] Dog walking (n = 55)
TP (n = 83)
S, T 2.5 0/2 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

Behavior Therapy or Parenting Skills

 Family Check-Up (FCU) [Parent Individual] (Ghaderi, Kadesjö, Björnsdotte, & Enebrink, 2018)c Youth with disruptive behavior (rated by parents or teachers [Sweden] Age 10–13 yrs (M = NR)
Male = NR
Ethnicity: NR
Professional therapists [Clinic] iComet (n = 109)
FCU (n = 122)
P, S, T 2.5, 12, 24 4/16 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Parenting Toolkit [Parent Self-Directed] (Irvine, Gelatt, Hammond, & Seeley, 2015) Youth with behavior problems [United States] Age 11–14 yrs (M = 13.1)
Male = 53%
Ethnicity: 40% AA, 29% C, 29% H, 1% Asian
Self-Directed [Computer] Waitlist (n = 152)
Parenting Toolkit (n = 155)
P 1 1/2 Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

 Positive Family Support-Family Check-Up (formerly Adolescent Transitions Program (ATP)) [Family & Parent Groups] (Irvine et al., 1999) Youth with disruptive behavior referred by schools or community social workers [United States] Age M = 12.2
Male = 61%
Ethnicity: 88% C, 12% NR
Paraprofessional [Clinic] Waitlist (n = 152)
ATP (n = 151)
P 3, 6, 9, 15 2/5 Not Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

 Positive Family Support-Family Check-Up (formerly Adolescent Transitions Program (ATP)) [Family & Parent Groups Only] (Dishion & Andrews, 1995) Youth with disruptive behavior [United States] Age 10–14 yrs (M = 12.4)
Male = 53%
Ethnicity: 95% C, Remainder NR
Professional and parent co-leader [Setting NR] Self-directed Parenting Bibliotherapy (n = 29)
ATP-Parent Only (n = 26)
P, T 4, 16 1/4 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Positive Family Support-Family Check-Up (formerly Adolescent Transitions Program (ATP)) [Youth Group Only] See Dishion & Andrews (1995) above See above See above Therapists NR [Setting NR] Self-directed Parenting Bibliotherapy (n = 29)
ATP-Youth Only (n = 32)
P, T 4, 16 0/4 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Positive Family Support-Family Check-Up (formerly Adolescent Transitions Program (ATP)) [Family & Parent Groups + Youth Group] See Dishion & Andrews (1995) above See above See above Professional and parent co-leader + therapists [Setting NR] Self-directed Parenting Bibliotherapy (n = 29)
ATP-Parent and Youth (n = 31)
P, T 4, 16 0/4 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT)

 Aggression Replacement Training + Positive Peer Culture (Equipping Youth to Help One Another (EQUIP)) [Youth Group] (Leeman, et al., 1993) JJ Youth in correctional placement for nonviolent crime [United States] Age 15–18 yrs (M = 16.0)
Male = 100%
Ethnicity: 67% C, 32% AA, 1% H
Paraprofessionals (Facility staff) [Detention facility] TAU juvenile justice facility (n = 37)
EQUIP (n = 20)
R 6, 12 1/2 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Cognitive Mediation [Youth Group] (Guerra & Slaby, 1990) JJ Youth incarcerated for violent crime [United States] Age 15–18 yrs (M = 17.0)
Male = 50%
Ethnicity: Primarily AA & H
Students [Detention facility] Attention control group (academic skills) (n = 40)
No treatment (n = 40)
Cognitive Mediation (n = 40)
R, T
R, T
4, 24
4, 24
1/2
1/2
Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

 Engage in Education-London (EIE-L) [Family, Youth Group, & Youth Individual] (Obsuth et al., 2017)c Youth with disruptive behavior (rated by teachers) [United Kingdom] Age 12–15 yrs (M = 14.0)
Male = 71%
Ethnicity: 25% British European, 5% Other European, 40% Black African, 13% Asian, 2% Latin American, 11% Mixed
Therapists NR [Home & School] No treatment (n = 306)
EIE-L (n = 300)
R, S, T 4 0/9 Not Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

 New Perspectives Aftercare Program (NPAP) [Youth Individual] (James et al., 2016)c JJ Youth releasing from detention at medium-high recidivism risk [The Netherlands] Age 15–26 yrs (M = 19.54)
Male = 97%
Ethnicity: 16% Dutch, 35% non-Western Immigrant, 28% Caribbean, 21% Other
Youth care workers [Setting NR] TAU (n = 61)
NPAP (n = 66)
S 9 0/1 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Preventing HIV/AIDS among Teens (PHAT Life) [Youth Group] (Kendall et al., 2017) JJ Youth with elevated aggression [United States] Age 13–17 yrs (M = 15.8)
Male = 65%
Ethnicity: 90% AA, 10% H
Trained facilitators [Evening Reporting Centers] Health promotion group (n = 43)
PHAT Life (n = 28)
S 6, 12 2/3 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 SafERteens: Delivered by Therapists In Person [Youth Individual] (Walton et al., 2010) Youth in emergency room who screened positive for violence and alcohol use [United States] Age 14–18 yrs (M = 16.8)
Male = 44%
Ethnicity: 39% C, 56% AA, 7% H
Professional social workers [Emergency Room] No treatment (brochure) (n = 235)
Therapist delivered SafERteens (n = 254)
S 3, 6 4/12 Not Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment
 Same sample 1 yr post-treatment (Cunningham, Foster, & Warner, 2010) S 12 2/3 Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

 SafERteens: Delivered by Computer [Youth Self-Directed] See Walton et al., (2010) above See above See above Youth Self-Directed [Computer in Emergency Room] No treatment (brochure) (n = 235)
Computer delivered SafERteens (n = 237)
S 3, 6 1/12 Not Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment
 Same sample 1 yr post-treatment See Cunningham et al., (2010) above S 12 0/3 Not Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

 Social Cognitive Intervention [Youth Group] (Singh, 2017) Youth with elevated aggressive behavior [India] Age 12–15 yrs (M = 13.4)
Male = 56%
Ethnicity: NR
Therapists NR [School] Attention control group (n = 63)
Social Cognitive Intervention (n = 63)
S 1.5 1/1 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Solution-Focused Group Program [Youth Group] (Shin, 2009) JJ Youth on probation [South Korea] Age M = 17.0
Male = NR
Ethnicity: NR
Professional social workers [Setting NR] Individual supportive sessions (n = 20)
Solution-Focused Group Program (n = 20)
S 1.5 1/1 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Think Cool Act Cool Emotion Regulation Training [Youth Individual] (te Brinke et al., 2021) Youth with disruptive behavior (rated by teachers) [The Netherlands] Age 12–15 yrs (M = NR)
Male = 71%
Ethnicity: 40% Dutch, 60% Non-Dutch
Professional psychologist and social workers [School] No treatment (n = 51)
Think Cool Act Cool (n = 57
P, S, T 4 0/3 Not Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

Combined Behavior Therapy and Attachment-Based Approach

 Connect [Family & Parent Groups] (Barone et al., 2021) Youth with disruptive behavior [Italy] Age 12–18 yrs (M = 14.89)
Male = 60%
Ethnicity: 89% Italian
Certified program leaders [Clinic] TAU (n = 50)
Connect (n = 50)
P, S 3, 4 4/4 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

Combined Behavior Therapy and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT)

 Rational-Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) [Youth Group] (Kumar, 2009) Youth with conduct disorder [India] Age 11–18 yrs (M = NR)
Male = 50%
Ethnicity: 100% Indian
Therapists NR [School] No treatment (n = 100)
REBT (n = 100)
S 3 1/1 Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

 Support to Reunite, Involve, and Value Each Other (STRIVE) [Family] (Milburn et al., 2012) Youth who had run away from home [United States] Age 12–17 yrs (M = 14.8)
Male = 34%
Ethnicity: 11% C, 21% AA, 62% H
Therapists NR [Home] Continued care from referral agency or referral to community program (n = 83)j
STRIVE (n = 68)
S 12 1/1 Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

Combined Behavior Therapy and Family Therapy

 Familias Unidas [Family Group & Family] (Pantin et al., 2009) Youth with disruptive behavior (rated by teachers, parents) [United States] Age 8th grade (M = 13.8)
Male = 64%
Ethnicity: 100% H
Master’s and PhD Professionals [Setting NR] Referrals to community programs (n = 104)j
Familias Unidas (n = 109)
P 30 1/2 Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

Combined Behavior Therapy, Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT), and Family Therapy

 Functional Family Therapy (FFT) [Family] (Alexander & Parsons, 1973) JJ Youth arrested or detained for behavioral offense [United States] Age 13–16 yrs (M = NR)
Male = 44%
Ethnicity: NR
Students [Clinic] Client-centered family groups (n = 19)
Psychodynamic family therapy (n = 11)
No treatment (n =10)
FFT (n = 46)
R 18 1/2 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Functional Family Therapy (FFT) [Family] (Sexton & Turner, 2010) JJ Youth sentenced to probation [United States] Age 13–17 yrs (Mdn = 15.0)
Male = 79%
Ethnicity: 78% C, 10% AA, 3% Nat A, 5% Asian
Professional therapists [Home] TAU probation services (n = 331)
FFT-high adherent therapists (n = 211)
R 12 1/1 Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

 Functional Family Therapy (FFT) [Family] (Hartnett, Carr, & Sexton, 2016) Youth with behavior problems [Ireland] Age M = 14.0
Male = 60%
Ethnicity: 100% Irish
Professional therapists [Home & Clinic] Waitlist (n = 55)
FFT (n = 42)
P, S 5 2/3 Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

 Functional Family Therapy (FFT) [Family] (Humayun et al., 2017)c JJ Youth sentenced for offending or with recent police contact for antisocial behavior [United Kingdom] Age 10–18 yrs (M = 15.0)
Male = 70%
Ethnicity: 90% White British, 10% non-White British
Master’s Professionals [Home] TAU (n = 46)
FFT (n = 65)
P, R, S 6, 18 0/10 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Functional Family Therapy (FFT) [Family] (Gan et al., 2021)c JJ Youth on community supervision [Singapore] Age 13–18 yrs (M = 16.2)
Male = 89%
Ethnicity: NR
Professional therapists [Home] TAU (n = 57)
FFT (n = 63)
R 20 1/1 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Henggeler, et al., 1992) JJ Youth at risk of placement for serious criminal activity [United States] Age M = 15.2
Male = 77%
Ethnicity: 42% C, 56% AA
Master’s Professionals [Home] TAU probation services (n = 41)
MST (n = 43)
P, R, S 3.25, 14.75 4/5 Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment
 Same sample M = 2.4 yrs post-referral (Henggeler, Melton, Smith, Schoenwald, & Hanley, 1993) R 28.8 1/1 Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Borduin, et al., 1995) JJ Youth in court for serious and chronic offending [United States] Age 12–17 yrs (M = 15.0)
Male = 69%
Ethnicity: 76% C, 22% AA, 1% H, 1% Asian
Students [Home] Individual therapy (blend of psychodynamic, client-centered, and behavioral) (n = 84)
MST (n = 92)
P, R, T 6 3/4 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment
 Same sample M = 13.7 yrs post-treatment (Schaeffer & Borduin, 2005) R 164.4 5/6 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment
 Same sample M = 21.9 yrs post-treatment (Sawyer & Borduin, 2011) R 262.8 9/16 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Henggeler, et al., 1997) JJ Youth at risk of placement for violent or chronic offenses [United States] Age 10–17 yrs (M = 15.2)
Male = 82%
Ethnicity: 19% C, 81% AA
Master’s Professionals [Home] Usual community services (n = 73)
MST delivered with low adherence (n = 82)
P, R, S 4.1, 20.4 1/7 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Henggeler, et al., 1999) JJ Youth on probation with disruptive behavior who had substance abuse disorders [United States] Age 12–17 yrs (M = 15.7)
Male = 79%
Ethnicity: 47% C, 50% AA, 1% H, 1% Asian
Master’s Professionals [Home] Usual community services (n = 59)
MST delivered with low adherence (n = 59)
R, S 4.3, 10.3 0/2 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment
 Same sample 4 yrs post-treatment (Henggeler, Clingempeel, Brondino, & Pickrel, 2002) R, S 52.3 2/4 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Ogden & Halliday-Boykins, 2004)c JJ Youth with serious disruptive behavior [Norway] Age 12–17 yrs (M = 15.0)
Male = 63%
Ethnicity: 95% Norwegian background
Bachelors and Master’s Professionals [Home] Usual child welfare services (n = 38)
MST (n = 62)
P, S, T 6 2/3 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment
 Same sample 2 yrs post-recruitment (Ogden & Hagen, 2006)c P, S, T 24 3/8 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Timmons-Mitchell, et al., 2006)c JJ Youth at risk of placement for felony offenses [United States] Age 12–17 yrs (M = 15.1)
Male = 88%
Ethnicity: 78% C, 16% AA, 4% H
Master’s Professionals [Home] Usual community services (n = 45)
MST (n = 48)
R 6, 12, 24 5/6 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Sundell, et al., 2008)c Youth with conduct disorder, referred by child welfare system [Sweden] Age 12–17 yrs (M = 15.0)
Male = 61%
Ethnicity: 53% Swedish, 16% European, 9% African, 19% Asian
Bachelors and Master’s Professionals [Home] TAU child welfare services in Sweden (n = 77)
MST delivered with low adherence (n = 79)
P, R, S 7 0/7 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Glisson, et al., 2010) JJ Youth offenders at risk of placement [United States] Age 9–17 yrs (M = 14.9)
Male = 69%
Ethnicity: 91% C, 5% AA, 1% H, 1% Nat A
Master’s and other Professionals [Home] TAU (n = 299)
MST (n = 316)
P 6, 18 1/4 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Butler, et al., 2011)c JJ Youth offenders [United Kingdom] Age 13–17 yrs (M = 15.0)
Male = 82%
Ethnicity: 38% White British/European; 33% Black African/Afro-Caribbean British; 5% Asian British
Master’s Professionals [Home] Youth Offending Teams (n = 52)
MST (n = 56)
P, R, S 6, 18 7/14 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Asscher, et al., 2013)c JJ Youth with severe and violent disruptive behavior [The Netherlands] Age 12–18 yrs (M = 16.0)
Male = 73%
Ethnicity: 55% Dutch; 15% Moroccan; 14% Surinamese
Therapist NR [Home] TAU (n = 109)
MST (n = 147)
P, S 6 5/6 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment
 Same sample 3 yrs post-baseline (Asscher et al., 2014)c P, R, S 12, 24, 36 5/15 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Weiss, et al., 2013)c Youth in self-contained behavior intervention classrooms; Note that this diverges from other MST studies [United States] Age 11–18 yrs (M = 14.6)
Male = 83%
Ethnicity: 40% C, 60% AA
Bachelors and Master’s Professionals [Home & School] Behaviorally focused classroom management plan (n = 80)
MST + Behaviorally focused classroom management plan (n = 84)
P, S, T 18, 30 2/4 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) [Family, Parent Individual, Youth Individual] (Fonagy et al., 2018)c Youth with moderate to severe antisocial behavior [United Kingdom] Age 11–17 yrs (M = 13)
Male = 63%
Ethnicity: 79% White British/European, 10% Black African/Afro-Caribbean, 2% Asian, 7% Mixed/Other
Therapist NR [Home] TAU (n = 342)
MST (n = 342)
P, R, S 6, 12, 18 1/17 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment
 Same sample 5 yrs post-baseline (Fonagy et al., 2020)c P, R, S 36, 48, 60 0/14 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Non-Violent Resistance (NVR) [Family] (Weinblatt & Omer, 2008) Youth with disruptive behavior [Israel] Age 4–17 yrs (M = 12.6)
Male = 68%
Ethnicity: NR
Professional therapists [Clinic and Phone] Waitlist (n = 20)
NVR (n = 21)
P 1 2/2 Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

 Treatment Foster Care Oregon (TFCO; formerly Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC)) [Family & Youth Individual] (Chamberlain & Reid, 1998) JJ Youth mandated to placement for serious delinquency [United States] Age 12–17 yrs (M = 14.9)
Male = 100%
Ethnicity: 85% C, 6% AA, 6% H, 3% Nat A
Trained foster parents, case managers, and therapists [Home] TAU juvenile justice group care (n = 42)
TFCO (n = 37)
R, S 12 4/4 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment
 Same sample 2 yrs post-baseline (Eddy, et al., 2004) R, S 24 4/4 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Treatment Foster Care Oregon (TFCO; formerly Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC)) [Family & Youth Individual] (Leve, et al., 2005) JJ Youth mandated to placement for serious delinquency [United States] Age 13–17 yrs (M = 15.3)
Male = 0%
Ethnicity: 74% C, 2% AA, 9% H, 1% Asian, 12% Nat A
Trained foster parents, case managers, and therapists [Home] TAU juvenile justice group care (n = 44)
TFCO (n = 37)
P, R, S 12 2/4 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment
 Same sample 2 yrs post-baseline (Chamberlain, et al., 2007) R, S 24 2/2 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Treatment Foster Care Oregon (TFCO; formerly Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC)) [Family & Youth Individual] (Westermark, et al., 2011)c JJ Youth with conduct disorder and risk of placement [Sweden] Age 12–18 yrs (M = 15.4)
Male = 51%
Ethnicity: 74% Swedish, 26% Immigrant
Trained foster parents, case managers, and therapists [Home] TAU (n = 15)
TFCO (n = 20)
P, S 24 3/4 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Treatment Foster Care Oregon (TFCO; formerly Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC)) [Family & Youth Individual] (Hansson & Olsson, 2012)c JJ Youth with conduct disorder and risk of placement [Sweden] Age 12–17 yrs (M = 15.0)
Male = 61%
Ethnicity: 65% Swedish, 35% Immigrant
Trained foster parents, case managers, and therapists [Home] TAU (n = 27)
TFCO (n = 19)
P, S 12, 24 2/6 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

 Usual Care Family Therapy [Family & Parent Individual] (Hogue et al., 2015) Youth with oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder [United States] Age 12–18 yrs (M = 15.3)
Male = 50%
Ethnicity: 64% H, 20% AA, 17% Mixed/Other
Professional Therapist [Clinic] Usual Care Other (n = NR)
Usual Care Family Therapy (n = NR)
Total Study (n = 205)
P, S 12 1/3 Not Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

Combined Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT), African Culture Reflective Identity and Life Skill Development, Case Management, and Peer Mentoring

 Redemption Reintegration Services (RRS) [Youth Group & Youth Individual] (Beausoleil et al., 2017) JJ Youth releasing from prison [Canada] Age 16–24 yrs (Intervention M = 19.5; Control M = 18.8)
Male = 89%
Ethnicity: 100% African Canadian
Case worker, housing worker, job counselor, resource developer, and nurse practitioner [Setting NR] Usual reintegration services (n = 115)
RRS (n = 115)
S 9 4/4 Superior to Active Placebo/Treatment

Interpersonal Therapy

 Group Interpersonal Therapy (G-IPT) [Youth Group] (Li et al., 2019)c Youth with elevated aggressive behavior [China] Age 18–19 yrs (M = NR)
Male = 53%
Ethnicity. NR
Therapist NR [Setting NR] No treatment (n = 30)
G-IPT (n = 30)
S 8 1/1 Superior to Waitlist/No Treatment

Notes: New papers added to this table since completion of the prior review by McCart and Sheidow (2016) are denoted by a superscript symbol.

a

Approach refers to Animal Assisted Therapy; Behavior Therapy or Parenting Skills; Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT); Combined Behavior Therapy and Attachment-Based; Combined Behavior Therapy and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT); Combined Behavior Therapy and Family Therapy; Combined Behavior Therapy, Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT), and Family Therapy; Combined Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT), African Culture Reflective Identity and Life Skill Development, Case Management, and Peer Mentoring; and Interpersonal Therapy

b

Format refers to Family, Family Group, Parent Group, Parent Individual, Youth Group, and/or Youth Individual.

c

Indicates studies that are by investigators independent from the treatment developers.

d

Samples denoted as JJ contain primarily juvenile justice-involved participants.

e

NR = Not Reported

f

Primary ethnicities are reported. AA = African American; C = Caucasian; H = Hispanic; Nat A = Native American.

g

TAU = Treatment as Usual

h

P = Parent- or caregiver-report; R = Official records; S = Self-report; T = Teacher-report.

i

This column indicates the number of disruptive behavior measures in the study that showed a statistically significant (p < .05) between-group difference favoring the target treatment. For example, an entry of 2/3 would indicate that the study included 3 measures of disruptive behavior and that the experimental treatment showed significantly better outcomes than the control condition on 2 of the measures.

j

Although referrals were made to community programs, no information was provided on participants’ actual receipt of services.