Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 24;7(11):2538–2550. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009088

Table 1.

Patient characteristics across three clinical cohorts

AML02 (N = 167) AML08 (N = 233) AAML1031 (N = 854) P value
Feature
Age at diagnosis, y 10.2 (0.01-21.4) 9.5 (0.01-19.9) 8.8 (0.0-29.5) .778
Sex .661
 Male 94/167 (56.3%) 123/233 (52.8%) 448/854 (52.5%)
 Female 73/167 (43.7%) 110/233 (47.2%) 406/854 (47.5%)
Race .031
 White 116/167 (69.5%) 166/233 (70.8%) 608/854 (71.2%)
 Black 29/167 (17.4%) 41/233 (17.6%) 102/854 (11.9%)
 Other 22/167 (11.9%) 26/233 (11.2%) 144/854 (16.9%)
Treatment arm .427
 Arm A 88/167 (52.7%) 108/233 (52.4%) 409/854 (47.9%)
 Arm B 79/167 (47.3%) 125/233 (47.6%) 445/854 (52.1%)
WBC (G/L) 20 (0-514) 26 (1-890) 20 (1-713) .824
Cytogenetic risk group <.00001
 Low 57/167 (34.1%) 57/233 (24.0%) 316/854 (37%)
 Standard 68/167 (40.7%) 134/233 (57.9%) 500/854 (58.5%)
 High 42/167 (25.2%) 42/233 (18.0%) 25/854 (3%)
 Unknown NA NA 13/854 (1.5%)

Median (range); n/N (%). Arm A, AML02 received low dose cytarabine: LDAC/ AML08 received clofarabine + Ara-C/COG; AAML1031 received standard ADE; Arm B, AML02 and AML08 received high-dose cytarabine (HDAC)/COG; AAML1031 received standard ADE + bortezomib. For AAML1031 cohort only patients from treatment arms A and B were included in this study, which might contribute to lower number in high-risk group category due to exclusion of FLT3-ITD AML.

A, Ara-C or cytarabine; D, daunorubicin; E, etoposide.