Skip to main content
. 2023 May 11;14:1180353. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1180353

Table 10.

Clinical postural stability studies.

References Year Severity Population Sample size Age Sex (%male) Motor test Method Parameters < 5 yrs 6–10 yrs 11–25 yrs >25 yrs
Geurts et al. (74) 1999 Mild Hospital Persistent symptoms T:15;C:20 T:35.9 C:35.4 T:53.3% C:60% Postural control: Eyes open, closed or with simple cognitive task Balance board 2x 30 secs per variable Anteroposterior sway +
Lateral sway +
Weight shifting +
Wright et al. (69) 2018 Mild Military veterans T:9;C:19 T:25.95 C:33.57 T/C: 45% Postural control Firm or foam, eyes open or closed, static or rolling scene Virtual environment TBI screening
3 × 30secs per variable
Sway area -
Pan et al. (65) 2015 Mild Military veterans Non-symptomatic T:6, C:10 T:26.5 C: Not stated T:100%
C:Not stated
Postural control: On floor or foam; Eyes open or closed Markers on sacrum, pelvis, C7 and shoulder. Pelvic postural sway -
Pelvic sway path length -
Pitch trunk angle -
Roll Trunk angle -
Postural control+ perturbation: On floor or foam; Eyes open or closed Upper trunk sway path length -
Pelvic sway path length -
Oscillations -
Military veterans Symptomatic T:8; C:10 T:87.5%
C:Not stated
Postural control: On floor or foam; Eyes open or closed Pelvic postural sway +
Pelvic sway path length +
Pitch trunk angle +
Roll trunk angle +
Postural control+ perturbation: On floor or foam; Eyes open or closed Upper trunk sway path length +
Pelvic sway path length -
Oscillations +
Rosenblum et al. (68) 2020 Mild College Athletes T:91;C:129 T:18.9; C:19.1 T:56.6%
C:56.6%
Sensory organization test Fixed/ sway surface, eyes open/closed, surrounding/sway-referenced surrounding, Smart Balance Master System
3 × 20secs per variable
Anterior-posterior sway (equilibrium score) -
Somatosensory sensory ratio -
Visual sensory ratio -
Vestibular sensory ratio -
Ustinova (73) 2017 Mild College Athletes T:13; C:13 T:34.9 C:33.8 T:30.8%
C:38.4%
Functional reach Interception of targets via arm at 5 fixed location 3D video game
30 reflective body markers
10 × 90sec games
Postural angular displacement -
Postural angular velocity +
Arm angular displacement -
Arm angular velocity +
Wright et al. (69) 2018 Combination Military veterans T:14; C:19 T:25.95 C:33.57 T/C: 45% Postural control Firm or foam, eyes open or closed, static or rolling scene Virtual environment TBI screening
3 × 30secs per variable
Sway area +
Helmich et al. (78) 2016 Combination University students w/o symptoms T:13; C:10 T:29 C:27 T:Not stated
C:40%
Postural control Stable vs. unstable surface, eyes open, closed or blurred Force platform
10 × 10sec trials per variable
COP path -
COP area -
Effort of balance -
Balance Error Scoring System Score -
University students with symptoms T:7; C:10 T:26 C:26 T:Not stated
C:40%
Postural control Stable vs. unstable surface, eyes open, closed or blurred COP path -
COP area -
Effort of balance +
Balance Error Scoring System Score +
Degani et al. (72) 2017 Combination Community T:11; C:11 T: 29.4; C: 26.8 T:45.5%
C:36%
Postural control Natural stance vs crossed arms Force platform
10 mins
Body sway area +
Amplitude of COP displacement +
Mean velocity of COP displacement +
Frequency of COP displacement +
Regularity of COP displacement +
De Beaumont et al. (76) 2011 Combination Collegiate athletes T:21; C:15 T/C: 22.3 T/C:
100%
Postural control Force platform
2 × 30 sec trials
Regularity of COP displacement +
Amplitude of COP displacement -
Johnston et al. (60) 2020 Combination Collegiate athletes T:30; C:90 T:20.3 C:20.2 T/C: 83.5% Y Balance test (Stand on one leg, reach other in anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral direction) Lumbar inertial sensor 3 trials Anterior Reach distance -
Regularity -
Amplitude -
Posteromedial Reach distance -
Regularity -
Amplitude -
Posterolateral Reach distance -
Regularity -
Amplitude -
Ledwidge et al. (134) 2020 Combination Collegiate athletes T:21; C:24 T:20.17 C:20.03 T:90% C:79% BESS balance test Feet together, non-dominant only, tandem on firm or foam surface - Score -
Lee et al. (71) 2020 Combination College students T:11; C:14 T:28.7 C:22 T:52%
C:35.7
Postural stability Force platform
120 sec
Body sway area -
Amplitude -
Mean velocity -
Frequency -
Regularity -
Asynchrony AP and ML -
Reilly et al. (70) 2020 Combination Community T:27; C:27 T:26.1 C:28.6 T:44.4%
C:77.8%
Postural stability Bipedal only Force platform Mean velocity -
Path length -
AP sway -
ML sway -
Body sway area -
Regularity (AP) -
Regularity (ML) -
Bipedal + cog task Mean velocity -
Path length -
AP sway +
ML sway -
Body sway area +
Regularity (AP) +
Regularity (ML) -
Unipedal only Mean velocity -
Path length -
AP sway -
ML sway -
Body sway area -
Regularity (AP) +
Regularity (ML) +
Unipedal + cog task Mean velocity -
Path length -
AP sway -
ML sway +
Body sway area +
Regularity (AP) +
Regularity (ML) +
Rosenblum et al. (68) 2020 Combination College Athletes T177;C:129 T:19.1 C:19.1 T:57.6%
C:56.6%
Sensory organization test Fixed/ sway surface, eyes open/closed, surrounding/sway-referenced surrounding, Smart Balance Master System
3 × 20secs per variable
Anterior-posterior sway (equilibrium score) -
Somatosensory sensory ratio -
Visual sensory ratio -
Vestibular sensory ratio -
Sosnoff et al. (63) 2011 Combination College athletes T:62; C:162 T/C: 20.04 T/C:
67.8%
Sensory organization test Fixed/ sway surface, eyes open/closed, surrounding/sway-referenced surrounding NeuroCom Smart Balance Master
3 × each test
Composite balance score -
Somatosensory sensory ratio -
Visual sensory ratio -
Vestibular sensory ratio -
Regularity (AP) +
Regularity (ML) +
Walker et al. (52) 2018 Combination Military veterans T:248; C:47 T:36 C:40.5 T:88%
C:79.5%
Sensory organization test Eyes open/fixed surface NeuroCom Smart Balance Master 3 × each test Equilibrium score -
Eyes closed/fixed surface Equilibrium score +
Eyes open/fixed surface/sway surroundings Equilibrium score +
Eyes open, sway surface, fixed surroundings Equilibrium score -
Eyes closed, sway surrounding Equilibrium score -
Eyes open, sway surface, sway surrounding Equilibrium score -
Composite score Equilibrium score +
Walker et al. (52) 2018 Combination Military veterans T:414; C:78 T:36 C:40.5 T:88.2%
C:79.5%
Sensory organization test Eyes open/fixed surface Equilibrium score -
Eyes closed/fixed surface Equilibrium score +
Eyes open/fixed surface/sway surroundings Equilibrium score +
Eyes open, sway surface, fixed surroundings Equilibrium score
Eyes closed, sway surrounding Equilibrium score
Eyes open, sway surface, sway surrounding Equilibrium score
Wright et al. (69) 2018 rmTBI Military veterans T:5;C:19 T:25.95 C:33.57 T/C: 45% Postural control Firm or foam, eyes open or closed, static or rolling scene Virtual environment TBI screening
3 × 30secs per variable
Sway area +
Rosenblum et al. (68) 2020 rmTBI College Athletes 2*TBI:52 3*TBI:34;
C: 129
2*T:19.1 3*T:19.8 C:18.1 2*T:62% 3*T:52%
C:56.6%
Sensory organization test Fixed/ sway surface, eyes open/closed, surrounding/sway-referenced surrounding, Smart Balance Master System
3 × 20secs per variable
Anterior-posterior sway (equilibrium score) -
Somatosensory sensory ratio -
Visual sensory ratio -
Vestibular sensory ratio -
Walker et al. (52) 2018 rmTBI Military veterans T:248; C:47 T:41 C:46 T:88.3%
C:78.7%
Sensory organization test Eyes open/fixed surface NeuroCom Smart Balance Master 3 × each test Equilibrium score -
Eyes closed/fixed surface Equilibrium score +
Eyes open/fixed surface/sway surroundings Equilibrium score +
Eyes open, sway surface, fixed surroundings Equilibrium score +
Eyes closed, sway surface Equilibrium score +
Eyes open, sway surface, sway surrounding Equilibrium score -
Composite score Composite Equilibrium Score +
Useros Olmo et al. (57) 2020 Mod-sev Hospital T:20; C:19 T:36.1 C:38.2 T:85%
C:89.5%
Postural control Standing only Force platform 2 mins recording Displacement of COP +
Standing + numerical cog task +
Standing + spatial memory cog task +
Zhang et al. (83) 2002 Mod-sev Rehabilitation T:10; C:10 T:30.6 C:31.8 T:50%
C:50%
Functional reach Unpredictable Force platform Board with two lights Stability ratio **
L predictable **
R predictable ***
Arce 2004 Severe Community T:7; C:10 T:26.4 C: 24.9 T:100%
C:100%
Postural control: Bimanual lifting No load × 3 Tetrax posturography system- two force platforms Stability score: standing +
4kg × 6 Forward weight shift -
8kg × 6 % change vertical ground reaction force -
Buster et al. (77) 2013 Severe Community T;10: C:10 T:36; C:24 Not stated Berg Balance test None Score +
Dynamic posturography Tilt platform 3 × 120 secs Dynamic movement analysis score +

+p < 0.05, -, not significant, ***strong power, **medium power.