Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun;25(6):352–366. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.02.005

Table 2.

General Comparison of the Outputs by FR1 and Leader Primer Sets of the Clinical Implementation Cohorts (MiSeq Platform) Based on the Analysis Strategy Outlined in Figure 3

Measure Overall (n = 423) Leader (n = 218) FR1 (n = 205) P
Sex, female/male, n (% female) 154/269 (36) 75/143 (34) 79/126 (39) NS
Age, mean (range), years 63.9 (27–93) 62.8 (27–90) 64.9 (36–93) NS
Sample type, n (%)
 Blood/bone marrow 348 (82)/45 (11) 189 (87)/10 (4.5) 159 (78)/35 (17) NS
 FFPE 27 (6) 18 (8) 9 (4)
 Other 3 (1) 1 (0.5) 2 (1)
Total reads, mean (range), n 658,285 (30,958–2,451,851) 562,757 (32,973–1,294,699) 759,870 (30,958–2,451,851) <0.0001 (t-test)
Cases with clonal sequences, n (%)
 0 5/423 (1.2) 1/218 (0.5) 4/205 (2) NS
 1 337/423 (79.7) 177/218 (81.2) 160/205 (78)
 2 79/423 (18.7) 39/218 (17.9) 40/205 (19.5)
 3 2/423 (0.5) 1/218 (0.5) 1/205 (0.5)
Total clonotypes detected, n 501 258 243 NS
Total productive clonotypes, n detected 435 228 207 NS
Major productive clonotype, n (%)
 Mutated (M) 192/418 (46) 105/217 (48) 87/201 (43) NS
 Unmutated (UM) 226/418 (54) 112/217 (52) 114/201 (57)
Cases with additional rearrangement(s), n (%)
 Productive (P) 17/81 (21) 11/40 (27.5) 6/41 (15) NS
 Unproductive (U) 64/81 (79) 29/40 (72.5) 35/41 (85)
 M 34/81 (42) 19/40 (47.5) 15/41 (37)
 UM 47/81 (58) 21/40 (52.5) 26/41 (63)
Cases with single productive rearrangement, n (%)
 M 162/337 (48) 86/177 (49) 76/160 (48)
 UM 175/337 (52) 91/177 (51) 84/160 (52)
Double rearrangement (>1 clonotype), n (%) 81/423 (19) 40/218 (18) 41/205 (20)
 P + U 64/423 (15) 29/218 (13) 35/205 (17)
 Mutation status concordant 59/64 (92) 28/29 (97) 31/35 (89)
 P,M + U,M 20/59 12/36 8/31
 P,UM + U,UM 39/59 16/36 23/31
 Mutation status discordant 5/64 (8) 1/29 (3) 4/35 (11)
 P,UM + U,M 5/5 1/1 4/4
 P,M + U,UM 0 0 0
 Double productive (PP) 15/423 (3.5) 10/218 (4.6) 5/205 (2.4) NS
 Mutation status concordant 13/15 9/10 4/5
 Both M 8/13 6/9 2/4
 Both UM 5/13 3/9 2/4
 Mutation status discordant 2/15 1/10 1/5
 Triple rearrangement 2/423 (0.5) 1/218 (0.5) 1/205 (0.5)
 Follow-up sample analyzed 16/81 6/40 10/41
Clonotype, % of total reads (range)
 All clonotypes detected 43 (2.5–92) 34 (3.5–74.7)∗∗∗ 52 (2.5–92)∗∗∗ <0.0001
 Major productive 46 (2.5–92)§ 37 (2.7–75)∗∗∗§ 57 (2.5–92)∗∗∗§ <0.0001
 Additional clonotype(s) 23 (3.2–63)§ 19 (3.6–63)∗∗§ 28 (3.2–59)∗∗§ 0.0026

The χ2 test was used to evaluate statistical significance of categorical variable. The t-test was used for continuous variables.

∗∗P ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗P ≤ 0.0001.

FFPE, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded; FR1, framework region 1; NS, not statistically significant.

Single unproductive only.

Including case(s) with three clonotypes.

The P values provided in the table reflect a comparison of leader versus FR1.

§

Statistically significant difference seen between percentage of reads of the major and additional clonotypes (P < 0.0001) within both primer sets and overall.