Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Jun 23;37(1):166–176. doi: 10.1037/adb0000863

Table 5.

AIC Values for Model Comparisons—$50 Magnitude

AUDIT
Alcohol consumption
Class Model Predictors AIC AUDIT rank AIC AC rank
Single predictors   1 MM50   96.33 3a 139.01 3
  2 AA50   99.17 4a 147.40 4a
  3 AM50   93.80 1 138.36 2
  4 MA50   93.93 2 137.98 1

Double predictors   5 MM50, AA50   102.20 6a 143.92 5a
  6 MM50, AM50   97.75 3a 141.70 3a
  7 MM50, MA50   95.99 2a 139.89 2
  8 AA50, AM50   99.32 5a 142.41 4a
  9 AA50, MA50   98.85 4a 145.48 6a
10 AM50, MA50   93.72 1 139.53 1

Triple predictors 11 MM50, AA50, AM50 101.28 3a 145.69 4a
12 MM50, AA50, MA50 101.87 4a 144.96 3a
13 MM50, AM50, MA50   97.81 1 142.84 1
14 AA50, AM50, MA50   99.49 2a 143.93 2

Quadruple predictors 15 MM50, AA50, AM50, MA50 103.56 147.16

Note. AIC = Akaike information criterion; AUDIT = alcohol use disorders identification test; AC = alcohol consumption. For each alcohol use measure, the best interclass AIC scores are in bold.

a

Denotes an unpreferred model relative to the best-performing model.