Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2023 Feb 24;66(5):3372–3392. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01858

Table 4.

In Vitro Pharmacological Activity of Class I Derivatives (Compounds 27a–e and 34a–h)a

Class I Binding (Ki)/Transactivation (IC50) (μM) SARD Activity (% degradation)



(ID) Ki (DHT=1nM)b IC50b Full Lengthb (LNCaP) @1 μM Splice Variantb (22RV1) @10 μM
8 0.267 0.085 76 87
27a 0.091 1.079 19, 87e 87
27b 0.729 0.871 48 60
27c 0.194 0.991 20 29
27d 0.249 1.243 38 0g
27e 0.810 1.025 51 -f
34a 3.615 0.277 70 0g
Class I 34b >100 0.687 60 0g
34c 1.476 0.560 40 0g
34d >100 >100 -f -f
34e >100 N/Af -f -f
34f >100 -g -f -f
34g >100 2.594 -f -f
34h >100 >100 -f -f
1 [R-Bicalutamide] 0.509 0.248 0g 0g
2 [Enzalutamide] 3.641 0.216 0g 0g
4 [Darolutamide] 4.231 0.048 -f -f
6 [Enobosarm]c 0.0038 0.0038c Agonistd Agonistd
a

Class I and II derivatives were in which the B-ring was substituted quinoline, carbazole, or benzotriazole were found to be selective androgen receptor degraders (SARDs).

b

AR binding, transactivation, and degradation assays were performed.

c

In vitro transcriptional activation was run in agonist mode for which the EC50 value was previously reported.13

d

The full agonist Enobosarm (compound 6) increases AR protein expression.

e

In vitro transcriptional activation was run in antagonist mode for which the IC50 value was previously reported.13 Tested at 10 μM concentration.

f

Not available (N/A).

g

No effect.