Table 2.
Logistic regression analysis predicting the response to a partner’s infidelity when using a forced-choice measure (N = 1,572).
| Predictor | B | SE | Wald | p value | Exp(B) | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | UL | ||||||
| Step 1 | |||||||
| Sex | −0.23 | 0.11 | 4.75 | 0.029 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.98 |
| Right 2D:4D | −1.79 | 1.19 | 2.25 | 0.134 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 1.73 |
| Relationship status | 0.87 | 0.11 | 58.60 | <0.001 | 2.38 | 1.91 | 2.97 |
| χ2(3) = 67.39, p < 0.001, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.057 | |||||||
| Step 2 | |||||||
| Sex | −0.03 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.804 | 0.97 | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Right 2D:4D | −1.90 | 1.20 | 2.53 | 0.112 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 1.56 |
| Relationship status | 1.14 | 0.16 | 54.21 | <0.001 | 3.13 | 2.31 | 4.24 |
| Interaction | 0.61 | 0.23 | 7.25 | 0.007 | 1.84 | 1.18 | 2.88 |
| χ2(4) = 74.66, p < 0.001, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.063 | |||||||
CI is confidence interval; LL and UL are lower and upper limits, respectively. Response to a partner’s infidelity (emotional infidelity = 1 and sexual infidelity = 2). Sex (male = 1 and female = 2). Relationship status (participants in not a committed relationship = 1 and those in one = 2). Interaction is sex × relationship status.