Skip to main content
. 2023 May 24;14:1172803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1172803

TABLE 1.

Descriptive statistics and item response distribution of the Italian version of the SACS.

Frequency (%) Mean SD Skewness
1 2 3 4 5
SACS1 1.4 6.9 20.3 47.0 24.4 3.86 0.91 -0.71
SACS2 1.4 5.1 14.7 57.1 21.7 3.93 0.83 -0.97
SACS3 6.9 24.9 29.5 26.7 12.0 3.12 1.12 -0.02
SACS4 27.2 38.7 17.5 11.5 5.1 2.29 1.14 0.73
SACS5 5.1 12.9 22.1 43.8 16.1 3.53 1.07 -0.62
SACS6 41.9 31.8 18.9 6.0 1.4 1.93 0.99 0.86
SACS7 7.4 14.7 18.9 41.5 17.5 3.47 1.16 -0.59
SACS8 14.3 31.3 24.9 24.0 5.5 2.75 1.14 0.14
SACS9 8.3 16.6 21.7 35.9 17.5 3.38 1.19 -0.43
SACS10 34.6 31.3 24.0 7.8 2.3 2.12 1.05 0.65
SACS11 1.4 9.2 23.0 40.6 25.8 3.80 0.97 -0.56
SACS12 26.3 35.0 31.8 6.0 0.9 2.20 0.93 0.31
SACS13 14.7 33.6 37.3 11.5 2.8 2.54 0.97 0.24
SACS14 6.0 16.6 15.2 42.4 19.8 3.53 1.16 -0.60
SACS15 4.6 14.7 20.7 37.3 22.6 2.59 1.13 -0.53

N = 217; SACS, Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale.