Skip to main content
. 2023 May 24;14:1140880. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1140880

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of the quantitative self-report questionnaires ZUF-8, SUS, and acceptance and feasibility answered by patients.

Outcome N M SD (SE)
ZUF-8 24 24.29 3.87 (0.791)
SUS 29 72.32 11.84 (2.2)
Acceptance & Feasibility 1. “I found the processing of the questionnaires in the preparation phase to be...” 29 3.41 0.825 (0.153)
2. “I found the intervention to be...” 33 3.52 0.906 (0.158)
3. “The intervention was feasible for me without any problems.” 33 3.18 0.769 (0.134)
4. “I found the challenges of the session to be...” 33 3.76 0.830 (0.145)
5. “I found the basic conditions during the intervention to be...” 34 3.53 0.929 (0.159)
6. “I found the intervention to be helpful in distracting from thoughts.” 32 2.69 0.931 (0.165)
7. “I found it helpful to be able to take the documentation of the session with me on paper.” 30 1.83 1.289 (0.235)
8. “I would like to continue a biofeedback offering at home.” 33 2.03 1.237 (0.215)
9. “I would recommend this study.” 32 2.75 1.016 (0.180)

Measurement of patients’ experiences regarding BFB training. ZUF-8, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, SUS, System Usability Scale. All analyses were conducted outlier corrected.