Table 5.
The quality assessment of the mobile system (N = 65).
| Subscale/item | Mean score | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engagement | 2.82 | 0.86 | |
| 1 | Entertainment | 1.75 | 0.71 |
| 2 | Interest | 2.52 | 0.94 |
| 3 | Customization | 3.12 | 0.98 |
| 4 | Interactivity | 3.74 | 0.91 |
| 5 | Target group | 2.95 | 0.78 |
| Functionality | 3.70 | 0.85 | |
| 6 | Performance | 3.72 | 0.86 |
| 7 | Ease of use | 3.50 | 0.83 |
| 8 | Navigation | 4.02 | 0.82 |
| 9 | Gestural design | 3.54 | 0.87 |
| Esthetics | 3.49 | 0.98 | |
| 10 | Layout | 3.55 | 0.94 |
| 11 | Graphics | 3.49 | 1.00 |
| 12 | Visual appeal | 3.42 | 1.00 |
| Information | 3.56 | 0.95 | |
| 13 | Quality of information | 3.77 | 0.91 |
| 14 | Quantity of information | 3.54 | 1.03 |
| 15 | Visual information | 2.95 | 1.11 |
| 16 | Credibility of source | 3.98 | 0.76 |
| Total uMARSa | 3.39 | 0.91 | |
| Subjective items | 3.49 | 0.92 | |
| 17 | Would you recommend | 4.22 | 0.76 |
| 18 | How many times | 3.28 | 1.10 |
| 19 | How many times | 2.77 | 1.00 |
| 20 | Overall (star) rating | 3.68 | 0.83 |