Skip to main content
. 2023 May 27;9(6):e16751. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16751

Table 2.

Effects of faba bean varieties and spatial arrangement on phenology, plant height and leaf area index of maize planted in sole and intercropped with faba bean varieties at Haramaya.

Factors DTT DTS DPM PH (cm) LAI
Faba bean varieties
M + Baqela Habasha 75.61 82.11 140.39ab 201.55 3.85
M + Baqela Faranji 75.06 81.67 139.94bc 203.69 3.92
M + Batte 74.89 81.61 138.72c 202.47 3.91
M + Gachena
75.39
82.11
141.28a
201.71
3.92
F-test Ns Ns ** Ns Ns
LSD (5%)
0.89
1.06
1.29
5.48
0.23
Spatial arrangement
1 M: 1 F B 75.13 81.67 140.13 200.21 3.94
1 M: 2 F B 75.46 82 140.33 201.84 3.98
2 M: 2 F B
75.13
81.96
139.79
205.01
3.77
F-test Ns Ns Ns Ns Ns
LSD (5%) 0.77 0.92 1.12 5.75 0.22
CV (%)
1.70
1.87
1.33
3.91
8.96
Cropping system
Intercropped maize 75.24 81.88 140.08 202.4 3.9
Sole maize
74
80.33
143
200.7
3.71
F-test Ns Ns Ns Ns Ns
LSD (5%) 4.18 4.33 5.75 9.93 0.38
CV (%) 6.6 6.3 4.8 5.8 11.4

Means in the same column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of significance according to LSD test; M = maize; F = faba bean; DTT = Days to 50% tasseling; DTS = Days to 50% silking; DPM = Days to physiological maturity; PH = Plant height; LAI = Leaf area index; CV = Coefficient of variation; ns = not significant at p < 0.05; *,** and *** indicate significant difference at probability level of 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively.