Table 4.
The CASP assessment table below represents the appraisal of three RCTs included
| QUESTIONS | Mazzagila et al. (2016) | Arts et al. (2017) | Karlsson et al. (2018) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Did the study address a clearly focused research question? | Y | Y | Y |
|
| |||
| Was the assignment of participants to interventions randomised? | Y | Y | Y |
|
| |||
| Were all participants who entered the study accounted for at its conclusion? | CT | CT | Y |
|
| |||
| Were the participants, investigators., and the people assessing/analysing outcome/s ‘blind’ to intervention they were given? | Y | CT | Y |
|
| |||
| Were the study groups similar at the start of the randomised controlled trial? | Y | N | N |
|
| |||
| Apart from the experimental intervention, did each study group receive the same level of care (that is. were they treated equally)? | Y | N | CT |
|
| |||
| Were the effects of intervention reported comprehensively? | Y | Y | Y |
|
| |||
| Was the precision of the estimate of the intervention or treatment effect reported? | CT | CT | CT |
|
| |||
| Do the benefits of the experimental intervention outweigh the harms and costs? | N | N | Y |
|
| |||
| Can the results be applied to your local population ‘in your context? | CT | CT | N |
|
| |||
| Would the experimental intervention provide greater value to the people in your care than any of the existing interventions? | Y | Y | Y |