Table 3.

Comparative analysis of the application of the multi-criteria models.

	Application of the models
The Conversion meter model	● veto criteria and indicators;
	● a list of criteria and indicators through which the office facility whose potential for conversion is considered;
	● the sums of positive responses multiplied by coefficients;
	● the final value is the final sum ranked within the scale;
The TOBUS model	● the criteria with a group of indicators are separated as modules that are individually evaluated and for each module possible software interventions are proposed;
	● the final value represents several intervention scenarios;
The ARP model	● the lists of criteria and indicators based on which the duration of the building as a physical structure is estimated;
	● an evaluation of types of obsolescence;
	● calculating the final value based on equations;
	● the final value is the potential expressed as a percentage ranked within the scale;
The iconCUR model	● list of indicators for each criterion;
	● the criteria values as coordinates in the spatial model;
	● matrix in which the percentage of indicators and the final value of criteria change;
	● the final result is a diagram showing the distance from the edges of the spatial model;
The PAAM model	● a list of indicators that determine the three key criteria;
	● the final value is descriptive and represents the sum of individual descriptive values of the criteria;