Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2023 May 24:2023.05.22.541439. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.05.22.541439

Rational screening for cooperativity in small-molecule inducers of protein–protein associations

Shuang Liu, Bingqi Tong, Jeremy W Mason, Jonathan M Ostrem, Antonin Tutter, Bruce K Hua, Sunny A Tang, Simone Bonazzi, Karin Briner, Frédéric Berst, Frédéric J Zécri, Stuart L Schreiber
PMCID: PMC10245867  PMID: 37292909

Abstract

The hallmark of a molecular glue is its ability to induce cooperative protein–protein interactions, leading to the formation of a ternary complex, despite weaker binding towards one or both individual proteins. Notably, the extent of cooperativity distinguishes molecular glues from bifunctional compounds, a second class of inducers of protein–protein interactions. However, apart from serendipitous discovery, there have been limited rational screening strategies for the high cooperativity exhibited by molecular glues. Here, we propose a binding-based screen of DNA-barcoded compounds on a target protein in the presence and absence of a presenter protein, using the “presenter ratio”, the ratio of ternary enrichment to binary enrichment, as a predictive measure of cooperativity. Through this approach, we identified a range of cooperative, noncooperative, and uncooperative compounds in a single DNA-encoded library screen with bromodomain (BRD)9 and the VHL–elongin C–elongin B (VCB) complex. Our most cooperative hit compound, 13-7 , exhibits micromolar binding affinity to BRD9 but nanomolar affinity for the ternary complex with BRD9 and VCB, with cooperativity comparable to classical molecular glues. This approach may enable the discovery of molecular glues for pre-selected proteins and thus facilitate the transition to a new paradigm of molecular therapeutics.

Full Text

The Full Text of this preprint is available as a PDF (1.4 MB). The Web version will be available soon.


Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES