TABLE 3.
Challenges and opportunities in detecting impact of Wellness-4–2 on reduction of neurodevelopmental vulnerability to mental health problems during infancy
| Challenge | Opportunity |
|---|---|
| 1. Mental health frameworks have traditionally not been applied to babies | 1. Accelerate capacity to detect prenatal intervention effects on mental health risk in close proximity to intervention delivery and identify malleable targets at the very early phase of the clinical sequence |
| 2. Mechanisms at the maternal-fetal interface in stress-related neurodevelopmental research are poorly understood | 2. Elucidating mechanisms by which maternal prenatal stress affects fetal and neonatal health will serve as a mechanistic bridge between exposure and neurodevelopment |
| 3. Few neuroimaging studies have emphasized engagement of culturally diverse populations, especially in longitudinal studies | 3. Melding neuroscientific and community-engaged approaches can generate culturally sensitive protocols to enhance representativeness of neurodevelopmental research |
| 4. Knowledge to Action (KTA) Gap: Robust evidence links’ adverse exposure and mental health risk but unknown whether improving the fetal environment will reduce risk |
4. Closing the KTA gap: Demonstrate causal relation via experimentally altering gestational environment and specify those features of dysregulation that are malleable to prenatal intervention |