Skip to main content
. 2023 May 24;13:1141810. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1141810

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Case 1 – Rectal polyp management options selected by 63 respondents. The management question for Case 1 allowed participants to select more than one option. While this image depicts the cumulative number of selections for each option, it does not show the combinations that were selected. Refer to Supplementary Tables 2S, 2.1S for specific combinations of management. Respondents who selected “Other, specify” (n=7) had the option for a write-in option; this could either be further elaborate on their modality selection answers and/or to provide an answer that was not given as an option; 3/7 answers centered around chemoprevention not being in the purview of the specialist taking the survey (and wanting to consult with other specialists) (which also selected ‘Uncertain’); while the other 4/7 (who also selected one or multiple management modalities) described in which order the modalities selected would take place and the thought process in their workup for in their evaluations, and their reasoning, and preference for wanting to know optimal dosing. Refer to Supplementary Table 2.1S for detailed write in responses. Of note “Endoscopic surv-rectum” in the legend = endoscopic surveillance of the rectum.