Table 4.
R2 = 0.14** | R2 = 0.14** | R2 = 0.27** | R2 = 0.28** | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE B | B | SE B | B | SE B | B | SE B | |||||
Primary Outcome(s) | PSS | 0.02* | 0.01 | PSI | 0.01* | <0.01 | Parent Fast-Food | 0.16** | 0.02 | PSS | 0.01 | 0.01 |
PSI | <0.01 | <0.01 | ||||||||||
CHAOS | −0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||||||
Parent FF | 0.16** | 0.03 | ||||||||||
Covariates | Child BMI | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
Child age | 0.02** | 0.01 | 0.02** | 0.01 | 0.02** | 0.01 | 0.02* | 0.01 | ||||
Parent Marital Status | 0.58** | 0.15 | 0.54** | 0.15 | 0.35* | 0.14 | 0.38** | 0.14 | ||||
Adults in the home | 0.02 | 0.01 | −0.06 | 0.10 | −0.01 | 0.09 | −0.01 | 0.09 |
p<0.05
p<.01
Note: The first three models have the independent variable of interest entered independently, the model with chaos as the independent variable was not significant and therefore not included. The last model has all four independent variables entered together with parenting fast-food consumption significantly associated with child fast-food consumption after controlling for child age, child BMI, parent marital status, and number of adults in the household.