Table 4.
State measure | Ma | SD | ωwithin | ωbetween | ICCperson | ICCdays|person | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Reappraisal | 2.45 | 1.41 | – | .87b | .49 | .59 | - | − .13 | .15 | .37 | .04 |
2. Mindful acceptance | 4.52 | 1.13 | – | .79b | .42 | .57 | − .03 | - | .12 | .18 | − .70 |
3. Mindful attention | 3.79 | 1.21 | – | .84b | .45 | .56 | .07 | .05 | - | .42 | − .25 |
4. PA | 3.19 | 0.76 | .81 | .91 | .39 | .59 | .16 | .14 | .21 | - | − .29 |
5. NA | 1.05 | 0.81 | .81 | .96 | .47 | .63 | − .02 | − .33 | − .16 | − .37 | - |
ωwithin within-person reliability and ωbetween between-person reliability (Geldhof et al., 2014; McNeish, 2018). PA positive affect, NA negative affect
aThe mean was calculated based on the person-level aggregated variables. Estimates in bold are significant at p < 0.05
bTo compute the between-person reliability for single items, we computed the mean for each of the three measurement bursts and then used the three indicators in a structural equation model to compute ωbetween
Averaged within-person correlations are shown in the lower left corner, and between-person correlations in the upper right corner