Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 20;4(2):260–274. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00178-7

Table 4.

Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, within-/between-person reliability, intraclass correlation, and zero-order associations) of the state measures in Study 2

State measure Ma SD ωwithin ωbetween ICCperson ICCdays|person 1 2 3 4 5
1. Reappraisal 2.45 1.41 .87b .49 .59 -  − .13 .15 .37 .04
2. Mindful acceptance 4.52 1.13 .79b .42 .57  − .03 - .12 .18  − .70
3. Mindful attention 3.79 1.21 .84b .45 .56 .07 .05 - .42  − .25
4. PA 3.19 0.76 .81 .91 .39 .59 .16 .14 .21 -  − .29
5. NA 1.05 0.81 .81 .96 .47 .63  − .02  − .33  − .16  − .37 -

ωwithin within-person reliability and ωbetween between-person reliability (Geldhof et al., 2014; McNeish, 2018). PA positive affect, NA negative affect

aThe mean was calculated based on the person-level aggregated variables. Estimates in bold are significant at p < 0.05

bTo compute the between-person reliability for single items, we computed the mean for each of the three measurement bursts and then used the three indicators in a structural equation model to compute ωbetween

Averaged within-person correlations are shown in the lower left corner, and between-person correlations in the upper right corner