Table 16.
Evaluation of methods for estimating age in adults based on Gustafson’s criteria [35]. When two values are given, they correspond to the metrics obtained on males/females
| Evaluation work | Population | n | Age | Estimation method | E (DA-CA) | AE (|DA-CA|) | SE | R2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| μ | σ | med. | μ | σ | med. | |||||||
| Timme [37] | German | 2346 | 15–70 | Olze [36] | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6.75 | 0.80 |
| Akay [160] | British | 250 | 18–60 | Olze [36] | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5.72 | 0.79 |
| Sonjaya [187] | Malaysian | 400 | 18–74 | Gustafson [35] | − 0.17 | 0.98 | – | – | – | – | 0.69 | 0.60 |
| Si [188] | Chinese | 1300 | 15–40 | Olze [36] | − 0.47/− 0.76 | – | – | 3.43/3.68 | – | – | 4.75 | 0.68 |
| Dezem [189] | Brazilian | 503 | 15–70 | Olze [36] | – | – | – | 11.08 | – | – | – | 0.23 |
| Timme [37] | – | – | – | 11.08 | – | – | – | 0.23 | ||||
| Koh [190] | Malaysian | 284 | 20–70 | Olze [36] | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10.92 | 0.39 |