Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 14;137(4):1117–1146. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-02960-z

Table 4.

Evaluation of the Nolla method [12]. When two values are given, they correspond to the metrics obtained on males/females

Evaluation work Population n Age E (DA-CA) AE (|DA-CA|) SE R2
μ σ med. μ σ med.
Kumaresan et al. [82] Malaysian 426 5–15 + 0.54 1.31 1.10
Berkvens et al. [64] Canadian 361 8–30 0.88
Hedge et al. [92] Indian 1200 5–15 − 0.13/− 0.30 0.81/0.82
Melo and Ata-Ali [93] Spanish 2541 7–21 − 0.27/− 0.16 0.50/0.23
da Luz et al. [94] Brazilian 930 8–15 + 0.09/ + 0.03 0.97/1.27 0.80/0.99 0.56/0.79 0.74/0.75
Croatian 924 8–15 − 0.13/− 0.44 1.43/1.44 1.08/1.07 0.94/1.05 0.85/0.75
AlQadi et al. [95] Yemeni 358 8–16 − 0.59/− 0.78 1.28/1.21 0.77/0.79
Yassin et al. [96] Saudi 458 5–11 − 1.05/− 1.12 3.07/3.30
Han et al. [97] Chinese 2000 5–15 + 0.18/− 0.02 1.22/1.27 0.66/0.77
Koç et al. [98] Turkish 916 6–14 − 0.49 1.02 0.89