Table 8.
Evaluation of Chaillet and Willems’ method [16] to estimate age in subadults. When two values are given, they correspond to the metrics obtained in males/females
| Evaluation work | Population | n | Age | E (DA-CA) | AE (|DA-CA|) | SE | R2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| μ | σ | med. | μ | σ | med. | ||||||
| Kelmendi et al. [107] | Kosovar | 1022 | 5–14 | − 0.24/− 0.35 | 0.85/0.74 | – | 0.72/0.66 | 0.52/0.49 | – | – | – |
| Rodríguez et al. [132] | Mexican | 182 | 6–15 | + 0.07/− 0.39 | – | – | 0.78/1.14 | – | – | – | – |
| Hegde et al. [146] | Indian | 1200 | 5–15 | − 0.12 | 0.69 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.55 |
| Bunyarit et al. [147] | Malaysian | 1569 | 5–18 | − 2.09/− 2.79 | 0.90/0.99 | – | – | – | – | – | – |