Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 25;26(2):355–367. doi: 10.1007/s40477-022-00755-3

Table 1.

Study characteristics of the included research for MMG

Author Year of publication Country Patients/lesions (n) Mean age (range) Imaging modalities Study design TP FP FN TN
Ying 2012 China 549/665 46 (12–92) MMG Retrospective 201 61 45 358
Wu 2016 China 312 49 (27–85) MMG Prospective 77 9 41 185
Shao 2013 China 90/90 53.2 ± 7.6 MMG Prospective 40 13 15 22
Mello 2017 Brazil 664 NA MMG Retrospective 83 44 9 528
Berg 2012 USA 4814 NA MMG Retrospective 57 414 18 4325
Habib 2009 Pakistan 20 36.5 [17–80] MMG Retrospective 11 4 1 4
Lehman 2012 USA 954/1208 35 [30–39] MMG Retrospective 14 66 9 1119
Zahid 2009 Pakistan 210 35–60 MMG Retrospective 40 6 12 152
Yu 2016 China 287 48.2 (32–75) MMG Retrospective 127 40 41 79
Ozulker 2010 Turkey 46/29 NA MMG Prospectively 13 5 3 8
Omranipour 2016 Iran 132 49.5 ± 10.3 MMG Prospectively 70 12 17 33
Meissnitzer 2015 Austria 67/92  > 50 MMG Prospective 57 18 10 7
Tan 2014 China 326 40–60 MMG Retrospective 36 28 38 224
Cho 2016 Korea 162 NA MMG Retrospective 49 42 17 54
Lee 2012 Korea 107/474 49.63 ± 10.43 MMG Retrospective 103 34 7 330
Zhao 2015 China 274 NA MMG Retrospective 117 37 15 105
Park 2014 Korea 114/118 49.6 ± 9.8 MMG Retrospective 24 14 18 62
Yao 2014 China 2036  > 35 MMG Retrospective 374 27 104 1529
Novikov 2017 Austria 367 NA MMG Prospective 346 19 21 51

NA not assigned, MMG mammograpgy