Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 7;13:9267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36087-3

Table 4.

Principal components analysis loadings of ELS variables by diagnostic group.

ELS variable Principal components
Composite 1 Composite 2 Composite 3
Fragile X syndrome
 Dysfluency-con 0.885 − 0.125 − 0.022
 Syntax-con 0.868 − 0.256 0.151
 Lexical diversity-con 0.864 − 0.201 0.164
 Talkativeness-con 0.100 0.197 0.846
 Unintelligibility-con − 0.221 0.843 0.163
 Dysfluency-nar 0.740 − 0.155 − 0.086
 Syntax-nar 0.697 − 0.492 − 0.189
 Lexical diversity-nar 0.673 − 0.497 0.267
 Talkativeness-nar − 0.017 − 0.071 0.919
 Unintelligibility-nar − 0.272 0.846 − 0.017
Down syndrome
 Dysfluency-con 0.291 0.840 − 0.171
 Syntax-con 0.787 0.387 0.129
 Lexical diversity-con 0.801 0.392 0.102
 Talkativeness-con 0.121 − 0.227 0.842
 Unintelligibility-con − 0.815 − 0.038 0.135
 Dysfluency-Nar 0.204 0.833 − 0.042
 Syntax-nar 0.843 0.382 0.005
 Lexical diversity-nar 0.820 0.273 0.317
 Talkativeness-nar − 0.069 0.041 0.881
 Unintelligibility-nar − 0.782 − 0.039 0.092

n = 80 (FXS), n = 78 (DS). Bolded values were those that loaded most highly on the component and thus, these are taken as the variables defining the component.