Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 7;13:9222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36149-6

Table 3.

Quantitative comparison of GTMNet with other methods on SateHaze1k dataset.

Setting Thin fog Moderate fog Thick fog Params
PSNR/dB SSIM PSNR/dB SSIM PSNR/dB SSIM
DCP4 13.15 0.725 9.78 0.574 10.25 0.585
DehazeNet5 19.75 0.895 18.12 0.855 14.33 0.706 0.009 M
Huang (SAR)7 24.16 0.906 25.31 0.926 25.07 0.864
SkyGAN8 25.38 0.925 25.58 0.904 23.43 0.893
TransRA14 25.20 0.930 26.50 0.947 22.73 0.875
Dehazeformer-T22 24.51 0.968 26.38 0.969 22.02 0.932 0.686 M
Dehazeformer-S22 24.60 0.968 26.52 0.971 22.11 0.933 1.283 M
Dehazeformer-B22 25.18 0.971 26.74 0.973 22.23 0.934 2.514 M
Dehazeformer-L22 25.89 0.974 27.23 0.973 23.14 0.942 25.44 M
GTMNet-T 25.14 0.970 26.73 0.971 22.31 0.935 0.798 M
GTMNet-S 24.72 0.967 26.61 0.972 22.29 0.935 1.396 M
GTMNet-B 24.89 0.970 27.22 0.973 23.02 0.939 2.629 M
GTMNet-L 25.52 0.972 27.18 0.973 22.96 0.940 25.87 M