Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 10;2013(12):CD001395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001395.pub4

Baber 1999.

Methods Randomisation method: not stated
 Blinding: double
 Allocation concealment: not stated
 Design: cross‐over
 Number screened for inclusion: not stated
 Number randomly assigned: 51
 Number dropped out: eight (seven for personal reasons, one for medical reasons not related to study)
 Number lost to follow‐up: none stated
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: no
 Power calculation: not stated
 Duration: three months × 2
 Timing: not stated
 Location: tertiary menopause clinic, Australia
 Funding: industry (Novogen Ltd, Australia)
Participants Inclusion criteria: minimum of mean of three hot flushes per day in week preceding trial
 Exclusion criteria: intercurrent medical problems, HT or antibiotics in previous three months, FSH < 30 mIU/mL, menstruation in previous six months, hysterectomy, vegetarian (> 10 g legumes/d)
 Age, years: 54 (±4.1) 
 Recruitment method: volunteers. Not further specified
Interventions
  • Phytoestrogen: Promensil (red clover extract)

    • Formulation: 40 mg of standardised isoflavones (genistein, daidzein, Fourmentin and Biochemic) per tablet

  • Placebo tablet

    • Dose, duration and timing of administration: one tablet daily in the morning for three months, one month washout period, then cross‐over to opposite arm for three months and two weeks

Outcomes Menopausal symptoms: daily flush frequency scored on daily diary card
 Quality of life: Greene Climacteric Scale
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "Allocated randomly and blindly," but method not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Stated as double‐blind
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Stated as double‐blind: analysis of data performed by separate group
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk High dropout
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Adverse events not reported