Skip to main content
. 2023 May 25;68:1605861. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605861

TABLE 3.

Summary of survey findings—Malaysian Health System Preparedness and Adaptation online survey (Geneva, Switzerland. 2022).

Survey question Response Clinical workers % Non-clinical workers % p-value Chi2
Malaysian health system preparedness and adaptation
 1 Did you feel the political decision makers in your country were aware of the risk to frontline workers? Quite a bit + very 68
 2 Did your healthcare workers receive adequate personal protection equipment dependant on their workplace setting? No 3 32 <0.001 34.99
 3 If you were on the frontline (in emergency departments, on respiratory, or ICU wards) taking care of Sars-CoV-2 positive patients, did you receive adequate personal protection equipment (PPE)? Completely 83
 4 How would you rate the severity of NCD service disruption (including elective surgery, follow-up clinics, routine care) during the pandemic? Occasional + very often 54 57 0.5 2.39
 5 Was the provision of individual protection devices adequate or inadequate? Adequate 54
 6 Were there contingency plans to shield the system in case of an external disruption like COVID-19? No 30 28 <0.001 38.07
 7 Do/did you anticipate an over burden on the NCD services when routine care eventually resumed? Yes 59 36 <0.001 27.9
 8 Do/did you have plans for gradual/spaced out resumption of routine care? Yes 79 16 <0.001 60.23
 9 Do you plan to evaluate the medical impact of this pandemic on NCDs? Yes 40
 10 Do you plan to evaluate the social and economic burden of this pandemic on NCDs management? Yes 42
 11 Is there a plan in place to screen the potential mental health impact of the pandemic? Yes 43
 12 As those with NCDs are the most vulnerable subgroups of patients, do you plan to target increased prevention, health education programmes towards them? Yes 54
 13 As those with NCDs are the most vulnerable subgroups of patients, do you plan to target increased outreach initiatives (using volunteers, increased personnel, etc.) and address accessibility (using telemedicine, mobile pharmacies, etc.)? Yes 61
 14 Would you agree/disagree with the need to ensure that whole populations should have increased health promotion, prevention schemes addressed to them to decrease vulnerabilities and predispositions to NCDs, with the goal of optimizing prognoses in the time of infectious epidemics? Agree 57 100 <0.001 28.29
 15 Would you consider using digital health applications for medical information sharing, especially for patients in multidisciplinary care settings? Yes 75 83 0.484 1.45
 16 Would you agree that digital health (eHealth or mHealth) can be integrated into your healthcare infrastructure to better care for your most vulnerable patients in crises such as this? Disagree + strongly disagree 68 32 <0.001 15.77
 17 To better maintain the normal flow of follow-ups and care of your country’s NCD patients, how likely are you to depend on telehealth, digital health, mobile health applications? Very much 80 48 <0.001 29.12
 18 Taking into account health literacy, access to mobile devices, and financial aspects, would digital health be an option for NCD patients to experience more autonomy over their care? Yes 80 86 0.28 2.55
 19 Did your country’s health system cope with the redistribution of resources (both human and economic) at the cost of continuous care of NCD patients? Yes 70
 20 Did you reorient national/regional guidelines and protocols to concentrate services in a setting suited to high-volume, high-acuity care available 24 h per day? Yes 41 5 <0.001 36.16
 21 Was redirecting chronic disease management to focus on maintaining supply chains for COVID-19 an option? Yes 52 19 <0.001 20.64
 22 If redirection of chronic care was an option, how successful was it in terms of delivery of care? Met standards 25 68 <0.001 30.22
 23 If redirection of chronic care was an option, how successful was it in terms of output? Met + above standards 68 58 0.17 1.85

Note: Frequency in percentage; p-value from chi2; missing p-value and chi2 due to no comparison group or expected value <5.

Total respondents n = 191